...
首页> 外文期刊>The econometrics journal >Testing for uncorrelated errors in ARMA models: non-standard Andrews-Ploberger tests
【24h】

Testing for uncorrelated errors in ARMA models: non-standard Andrews-Ploberger tests

机译:在ARMA模型中测试不相关的错误:非标准的Andrews-Ploberger测试

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A problem of interest in economic and finance applications is testing whether ARMA (Autoregressive moving average) errors are uncorrelated under weak assumptions, namely assumptions where the errors are neither iid nor a martingale difference. In this paper, non-standard versions of the tests of serial correlation introduced by Andrews and Ploberger (1996, hereafter AP) are proposed for diagnostic checking of ARMA errors. The original AP tests are designed for the case where the observed time series is generated by ARMA( 1,1) models under the alternative and use asymptotic critical values computed by AP. The non-standard testing procedure uses AP statistics calculated from residuals and critical values based on asymptotic distribution theory derived under weak assumptions. The motivation for modifying the original AP tests is that they have attractive properties for the case for which they were originally designed: They are consistent against all non-white noise alternatives and have good all-round power against non-seasonal alternatives compared to several widely used tests in the literature, including those of Box and Pierce (1970, hereafter BP) and Ljung and Box (1978, hereafter LB) tests. A further advantage of the AP tests is that there is no need to specify a cutoff lag-length as is necessary for the BP and LB tests. We compare the non-standard AP tests with the non-standard BP and LB tests proposed by Francq et al. (2005), the tests of Hong and Lee (2007), and the tests using standardized residuals proposed by Chen (2008). In Monte Carlo experiments using ARMA models with GARCH (Generalised autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity), EGARCH (Exponential GARCH) and non-MDS (Martingale difference sequence) innovations, the non-standard AP tests generally have better power than the other tests we consider. This suggests that the power advantage of the original AP tests extends to the more general framework considered in this paper.
机译:经济和金融应用中的一个感兴趣的问题是测试在弱假设(即错误既不是同余也不是a差)的假设下,ARMA(自回归移动平均线)误差是否不相关。本文提出了由Andrews和Ploberger(1996,以下称AP)引入的串行相关性测试的非标准版本,用于ARMA错误的诊断检查。最初的AP测试是针对以下情况设计的:观测到的时间序列是由ARMA(1,1)模型在替代条件下生成的,并使用AP计算的渐近临界值。非标准测试程序使用基于在弱假设下得出的渐近分布理论,根据残差和临界值计算的AP统计数据。修改原始AP测试的动机是,对于最初设计的测试而言,它们具有诱人的性能:与其他几种非白噪声替代方案相比,它们与所有非白噪声替代方案都具有一致性,并且对非季节性替代方案具有良好的全面能力。使用了文献中的测试,包括Box和Pierce(1970,以下称BP)以及Ljung and Box(1978,以下称LB)的测试。 AP测试的另一个优点是,无需指定BP和LB测试所需的截止滞后长度。我们将非标准AP测试与Francq等人提出的非标准BP和LB测试进行了比较。 (2005年),Hong和Lee(2007年)的检验,以及Chen(2008年)提出的使用标准化残差的检验。在使用具有GARCH(广义自回归条件异方差),EGARCH(指数GARCH)和非MDS(Martingale差分序列)创新的ARMA模型进行的蒙特卡洛实验中,非标准AP测试通常比我们考虑的其他测试具有更好的功能。这表明原始AP测试的功能优势扩展到了本文考虑的更通用的框架。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号