...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecology >CONSUMER RESOURCE MATCHING IN URBANIZING LANDSCAPES: ARE SYNANTHROPIC SPECIES OVER-MATCHING
【24h】

CONSUMER RESOURCE MATCHING IN URBANIZING LANDSCAPES: ARE SYNANTHROPIC SPECIES OVER-MATCHING

机译:城市景观中的消费者资源匹配:过度匹配的共生物种

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Population responses of synanthropic species to urbanization may be explained by the resource-matching rule, which postulates that individuals should distribute themselves according to resource availability. According to the resource-matching rule, urban habitats will contain greater densities if they provide better resources than rural habitats. However, because resource availability is density dependent, individuals in urban areas would ultimately achieve fitness levels comparable to, but no better than, individuals in less urban areas. Some ecologists suggest that synanthropic birds may not conform to the resource-matching rule and may instead overmatch (i.e., overexploit) in urban habitats, ultimately leading to lower fitness despite greater resource levels. Using the Northern Cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis) as a focal species, we evaluated if Cardinal populations in urban and rural habitats were consistent with predictions of consumer resource matching. During 2003–2006 we documented population density, adult body condition, apparent survival, and annual reproductive productivity of Cardinals in riparian forest stands within urban (n = 8 stands) and rural (n = 6 stands) landscapes in Ohio, USA. Density of Cardinals in urban forests was four times that found in more rural forests. Mark–resight data from 147 males and 125 females over four years indicated that apparent survival rates were similar between urban and rural landscapes ( = 0.64, SE = 0.039 for males and = 0.57, SE = 0.04 for females). Similarly, body condition indices of 168 males, 142 females, and 118 nestlings did not differ significantly between landscapes. Annual reproductive productivity (mean number of fledglings per pair over breeding season) of 294 pairs was comparable for urban (2.4 ± 0.18 [mean ± SE] and rural (2.1 ± 0.18) young birds. Thus, contrary to recent suggestions, we find that high densities of certain synanthropic species in urban landscapes are consistent with expectations of consumer resource matching.
机译:合生物种对城市化的人口反应可以用资源匹配法则来解释,该法则假设个人应根据资源的可获得性来分配自己。根据资源匹配规则,如果城市栖息地提供的资源比农村栖息地更好,则其密度将更高。但是,由于资源的可用性取决于密度,因此城市地区的人们最终会达到的健康水平与城市地区较少的人相当,但并不比这更好。一些生态学家建议,合人类鸟类可能不符合资源匹配规则,而可能在城市栖息地中过度匹配(即过度利用),尽管资源水平较高,最终导致适应性降低。以北部红衣主教(Cardinalis cardinalis)为重点物种,我们评估了城市和农村生境中的红衣主教种群是否与消费者资源匹配的预测相符。在2003年至2006年期间,我们记录了美国俄亥俄州城市(n = 8林分)和乡村(n = 6林分)景观内河岸林地中红衣主教的人口密度,成年人体状况,明显的存活率和年繁殖生产力。城市森林中红衣主教的密度是乡村森林中的四倍。四年中来自147位男性和125位女性的Mark-review数据表明,城市和乡村景观的表观存活率相似(男性= 0.64,SE = 0.039,女性= 0.57,SE = 0.04)。同样,景观之间的男性168位,女性142位和118位雏鸟的身体状况指数也没有显着差异。 294对的年繁殖生产力(繁殖季节中每对幼雏的平均数量)可与城市幼鸟(2.4±0.18 [平均值±SE]和农村幼鸟(2.1±0.18))相比较,因此,与最近的建议相反,我们发现城市景观中某些同生物种的高密度与消费者资源匹配的期望相一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号