首页> 外文期刊>Ecological research >Effects of different management regimes on aquatic macroinvertebrate diversity in Australian rice fields
【24h】

Effects of different management regimes on aquatic macroinvertebrate diversity in Australian rice fields

机译:不同管理方式对澳大利亚稻田水生无脊椎动物多样性的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The maintenance of invertebrate diversity within agricultural environments can enhance a number of agronomically important processes, such as nutrient cycling and biological pest control. However, few Australian studies have been undertaken which specifically address the effects of commercial management regimes on rice field biodiversity. In this study, we compared aquatic macroinvertebrate communities within Australian rice fields cultivated under three commercial management regimes: conventional-aerial (agrochemicals applied, aerially sown), conventional-drill (agrochemicals applied, directly drill-sown) and organic-drill (agrochemical-free, directly drill-sown). These comparisons were undertaken using a combination of community assessment approaches, including morphospecies richness, abundance, diversity and community composition. In general, greater biodiversity existed within macroinvertebrate communities that developed under organic management regimes than under conventional regimes (i.e., higher morphospecies richness and Shannon diversity). Although there were significant differences in several parameters across management regimes early in the rice-growing season, as the growing season progressed the invertebrate communities that developed in the different management regimes became more similar. Only community composition analyses showed significant differences late in the growing season, with functional differences across aquatic faunal assemblages suggested by increased predator abundance in communities sampled from the organic management regime. In order to improve biodiversity within these aquatic environments, management techniques need to be examined individually and the most disruptive processes identified. Alternative management procedures can then be developed that minimise biodiversity loss whilst still delivering required agronomic outcomes.
机译:在农业环境中维持无脊椎动物的多样性可以增强许多重要的农艺过程,例如营养循环和生物虫害防治。但是,很少有澳大利亚研究专门针对商业管理制度对稻田生物多样性的影响进行研究。在这项研究中,我们比较了在三种商业管理制度下种植的澳大利亚稻田中的水生无脊椎动物群落:常规航空(施用农药,空中播种),常规钻(施用农药,直接播种)和有机钻具(农药免费,直接播种)。这些比较是通过结合社区评估方法进行的,包括形态物种的丰富性,丰度,多样性和社区组成。一般而言,在有机管理制度下发展的大型无脊椎动物群落中存在的生物多样性要比传统制度下更大(即形态物种丰富度和香农多样性更高)。尽管在水稻生长季节初期,各个管理制度中的几个参数存在显着差异,但随着生长季节的发展,在不同管理制度中发展起来的无脊椎动物群落变得越来越相似。只有群落组成分析显示在生长期后期存在显着差异,而从有机管理制度中抽样的群落中,捕食者数量的增加表明水生动物群落的功能存在差异。为了改善这些水生环境中的生物多样性,需要单独检查管理技术并确定最具破坏性的过程。然后可以制定替代管理程序,以最大程度地减少生物多样性的损失,同时仍提供所需的农艺成果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号