首页> 外文期刊>Ecological research >Comparative performance of species-richness estimators using data from a subtropical forest tree community
【24h】

Comparative performance of species-richness estimators using data from a subtropical forest tree community

机译:利用来自亚热带林木群落的数据进行的物种丰富度估算器的比较性能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We used survey data collected from a large plot (20 ha) of sub-tropical forest in the Dinghushan Nature Reserve, Guangdong Province, southern China, in 2005 to test the comparative performance of nine species-richness estimators (number of observed species, three species-individual curve models, five nonparametric estimators). As the true species richness, we used the 210 free-standing shrub and tree species of > 1 cm diameter at breast height recorded during the survey. This true species richness was then used to calculate performance measures of bias, accuracy, and precision for each estimator, whereby we distinguished performance for low, medium, and high sampling intensity. Unsurprisingly, all estimators performed better than the number of observed species in terms of bias and accuracy. Surprisingly, however, two curve models (logistic and logarithm) outperformed all other estimators in terms of bias, accuracy, and precision, which is in contrast to most other previous studies, in which nonparametricrnmethods usually outperform curve models. Intriguingly, relative estimator performance changed between low, medium, and high sampling intensity, sometimes dramatically, reinforcing the assertion that the influence of sampling intensity on estimator performance is an important aspect to investigate and to consider when choosing estimators for ecological surveys. Because these results are based on only one dataset, the results should be treated with caution, both because (1) the generality of these results needs to be confirmed with simulated datasets and (2) more work is needed to establish what "true" species richness is extrapolated by each of the tested estimators in both the statistical and the practical sense. Nevertheless, the two curve estimators, namely Logistic and Logarithm, should be considered in future studies of comparative performance of species-richness estimators because of their outstanding performance in this study.
机译:我们使用2005年从中国南方广东省鼎湖山自然保护区的大片亚热带森林地块(20公顷)收集的调查数据来检验9种物种丰富度估算器的比较性能(观测物种数,3种种-个体曲线模型,五个非参数估计量)。作为真实的物种丰富度,我们使用了在调查期间记录的210种独立的灌木和树木,它们的胸高直径大于1厘米。然后使用这种真实的物种丰富度来计算每个估计量的偏差,准确性和精确度的性能指标,从而区分低,中和高采样强度的性能。毫不奇怪,就偏差和准确性而言,所有估计量的表现都好于被观察物种的数量。但是,令人惊讶的是,在偏差,准确性和精度方面,两个曲线模型(对数和对数)优于所有其他估计量,这与以前的大多数其他研究相反,在大多数其他研究中,非参数方法通常优于曲线模型。有趣的是,相对估计器的性能在低,中和高采样强度之间发生变化,有时会发生显着变化,这进一步证明了以下观点:采样强度对估计器性能的影响是研究和选择生态调查估计器时要考虑的重要方面。由于这些结果仅基于一个数据集,因此应谨慎对待结果,这是因为(1)这些结果的一般性需要通过模拟数据集来确认,以及(2)需要更多的工作来确定哪些“真实”物种丰富度由统计和实际意义上的每个测试估算器推断。然而,由于对物种丰富度估算器的比较性能的未来表现,在未来的研究中应考虑两个曲线估算器,即对数和对数。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ecological research》 |2010年第1期|93-101|共9页
  • 作者单位

    South China Botanical Garden, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, 723, Xingke Road, Tianhe District, 510650, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China Applied Science and Technology College, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, 541004 Guilin, People's Republic of China School of the Chinese Academy of Science, 100039 Beijing, People's Republic of China;

    South China Botanical Garden, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, 723, Xingke Road, Tianhe District, 510650, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China Applied Science and Technology College, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, 541004 Guilin, People's Republic of China School of the Chinese Academy of Science, 100039 Beijing, People's Republic of China;

    Science Department, American University of Paris, 31 Avenue Bosquet, 75007 Paris, France;

    South China Botanical Garden, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, 723, Xingke Road, Tianhe District, 510650, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China;

    South China Botanical Garden, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, 723, Xingke Road, Tianhe District, 510650, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China;

    South China Botanical Garden, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, 723, Xingke Road, Tianhe District, 510650, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China;

    South China Botanical Garden, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, 723, Xingke Road, Tianhe District, 510650, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China;

    South China Botanical Garden, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, 723, Xingke Road, Tianhe District, 510650, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China;

    National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    bootstrap; chaol; chao3; jackknife; species-individual curves; species-richness estimation;

    机译:引导程序昭chao3;折刀物种-个体曲线;物种丰富度估计;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号