...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological research >Disentangling the influence of local and landscape factors on alpha and beta diversities: opposite response of plants and ground-dwelling arthropods in wet meadows
【24h】

Disentangling the influence of local and landscape factors on alpha and beta diversities: opposite response of plants and ground-dwelling arthropods in wet meadows

机译:解开局部和景观因素对α和β多样性的影响:湿草甸上植物和地面节肢动物的相反反应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A large number of studies have tried to understand the determinants of local species richness, i.e. alpha-diversity. Studies dealing with beta-diversity are considerably less numerous but their number has increased in the recent years. In this study, we assessed the relative importance of local and landscape (i.e. composition and connectivity) variables in explaining alpha- and beta-diversities (species turnover and nestedness) of three highly diverse groups, differing in mobility and dispersal: plants, spiders, and carabids. Sampling took place in 2013, using suction samplers for arthropods and phytosociological relev,s for vegetation, in 77 hay meadows distributed along 200 km of the Loire Valley (France). We found plant alpha-diversity to be driven by local factors, whereas spider and carabid alpha-diversities were mostly determined by landscape factors (by composition and connectivity, respectively). Nestedness was negligible for the three groups. Plant beta-diversity was also mainly influenced by local factors, whereas spider beta-diversity was driven by landscape factors (composition and connectivity, equally). Surprisingly, carabid beta-diversity was mainly influenced by local factors and landscape connectivity. Despite these differences, plant, spider, and carabid beta-diversities were not different, suggesting comparable dispersal abilities and/or a low connectivity at large scale, which is in accordance with the high species turnover observed here. Managing biodiversity in meadows consequently necessitates acting at local and landscape scales, the first targeting plants and the second arthropods.
机译:大量研究试图理解当地物种丰富度的决定因素,即阿尔法多样性。有关β多样性的研究数量虽然很少,但近年来却有所增加。在这项研究中,我们评估了局部和景观变量(即组成和连通性)的相对重要性,以解释三个高度不同的群体的α和β多样性(物种周转率和巢度),它们的活动性和分散性不同:植物,蜘蛛,和登山扣。 2013年,在沿卢瓦尔河谷(法国)200公里处分布的77个干草草甸中,使用节肢动物和植物学相关植物的吸力采样器进行了采样。我们发现植物的α-多样性是由局部因素驱动的,而蜘蛛和甲类的α-多样性主要是由景观因素决定的(分别由组成和连通性决定)。嵌套对于这三组微不足道。植物的β-多样性也主要受当地因素的影响,而蜘蛛的β-多样性则受景观因素(成分和连通性均等)的驱动。令人惊讶的是,甲级β多样性主要受当地因素和景观连通性的影响。尽管存在这些差异,但植物,蜘蛛和甲型β多样性没有差异,这表明可比的分散能力和/或大规模的低连通性,这与此处观察到的高物种更新率相符。因此,要管理草地的生物多样性,就必须在地方和景观尺度上行动,首先是针对植物,第二是节肢动物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号