首页> 外文期刊>Ecological indicators >Indicators and methods to assess sustainability of wastewater sludge management in the perspective of two systems ecology models
【24h】

Indicators and methods to assess sustainability of wastewater sludge management in the perspective of two systems ecology models

机译:评估两种系统生态模型的视角评估废水污泥管理可持续性的指标和方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper, inspired by Sven Erik Jorgensen's academic life, takes a systems ecology perspective on sustainability in wastewater sludge management. First, an overview identifies the indicators and methods currently used to assess sustainability and sustainable development in the area of wastewater sludge. Second, two systems ecology conceptual models are presented. Third, the indicators and methods are discussed in the perspective of these systems ecology models. Four methods were found common in assessing wastewater sludge sustainability: Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Exergy Analysis (ExA), Emergy Analysis (EmA), and Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA). Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA) was added since it was found to be used in the larger wastewater treatment context, and complements the other four methods. When comparing the indicators and methods with the systems ecology models it was found that no method covered every aspect of the models. ExA, EmA and ERA covered the full extent of the models but not from every aspect interesting from a sustainability point of view. LCA and CBA had a lower reach at the ecosystem side of the models, but produced deeper knowledge regarding environmental impacts for LCA, and economic flows and storages for CBA. The investigation concludes that a complementary approach of methods and indicators is needed to assess sustainability, and they are suggested to be used in an integrated way, in the spirit of Sven Erik Jorgensen's findings.
机译:本文灵感来自Sven Eraik Jorgensen的学术生活,采用了系统生态学的污水污泥管理可持续性的观点。首先,概述识别目前用于评估废水污泥领域的可持续性和可持续发展的指标和方法。其次,提出了两个系统生态学概念模型。第三,以这些系统生态模型的角度来讨论指标和方法。在评估废水污泥可持续性方面存在常见的四种方法:生命周期评估(LCA),Deerteny分析(EXA),可渗透分析(EMA)和成本效益分析(CBA)。增加了环境风险评估(ERA),因为发现它被发现用于较大的废水处理背景,并补充其他四种方法。在将指标和方法与系统生态模型进行比较时,发现没有任何方法涵盖了模型的各个方面。 EXA,EMA和ERA涵盖了模型的全部范围,但不是从可持续性的观点中有趣的各个方面。 LCA和CBA在模型的生态系统方面具有较低的覆盖范围,但对LCA的环境影响以及CBA的经济流量和议案产生了更深层次的知识。调查的结论是,需要采取互补方法和指标的互补方法来评估可持续性,并建议以综合方式使用,以索维埃里克·杰戈伦登的调查结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号