首页> 外文期刊>Ecological indicators >Emergy evaluation of a swamp dike-pond complex: A new ecological restoration mode of coal-mining subsidence areas in China
【24h】

Emergy evaluation of a swamp dike-pond complex: A new ecological restoration mode of coal-mining subsidence areas in China

机译:沼泽堤防综合体能值评估:中国采煤塌陷区的生态修复新模式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The swamp dike-pond complex (SDPC) is a mode of ecological restoration in coal-mining subsidence areas in China that consists of an engineered swamp and an engineered dike-pond. The aim of this study is to compare conventional reclamation and ecological restoration systems by performing emergy analysis. The analysed systems included an SDPC and contrasting fish ponds (CFP) in a stabilized subsidence area and an SDPC in a submergence area that can be used as a transition system during the course of the succession of coal-mining subsidence areas. Indices, ratios and ternary diagrams based on emergy can be used to assess the behaviours of the three systems. Emergy analysis was well suited for this task because it was capable of converting all energies, materials and information to a common unit of quality to allow for deep comparisons across the three systems.The results show that the SDPC was most dependent upon renewable resources, and efforts were made to maintain the natural mechanisms of energy and matter flow regulation as much as possible. Therefore, the SDPC has greater emergy efficiency in terms of biological energy use and the level of environmental loading. The CFP was more dependent on the fraction of purchased inputs and nonrenewable inputs from the outside. The sustainability index values for the three systems ranged from 0.82 for the CFP in the stabilized subsidence area to 4.31 for the SDPC in the submergence area and 9.12 for the SDPC in the stabilized subsidence area. The results confirm that the SDPC is less stressful on the environment and more sustainable than the CFP in coal-mining subsidence areas. In addition, the respective ecosystem service values for each system were 1.52E + 17 sej/yr/ha for the SDPC in the stabilized subsidence area and 2.90E + 16 sej/yr/ha for the SDPC in the submergence area, which were 10.1 and 1.9 times higher than the value for the CFP, respectively. This research suggests that vegetation, faunal communities and functional hydrology, which support the entire ecosystem via the food web, can be restored in the SDPC, and restored wetlands can provide economic and ecological benefits via the return of their ecological services and functions. Endangered and rare species, such as Baer's pochard (Aythya baeri) and reed parrotbill (Paradoxornis heudei), were found in this area, and the prospects of such species depend on future restoration policies in coal-mining subsidence areas in China. To safeguard biodiversity, SDPCs should be preferred over other reclamation methods. This work will inform environmental policy making and be used to recommend better management practices to the government.
机译:沼泽堤防综合体(SDPC)是中国采煤塌陷区生态恢复的一种模式,由工程沼泽和工程堤防组成。这项研究的目的是通过进行能值分析来比较传统的填海和生态恢复系统。所分析的系统包括在稳定的塌陷区中的SDPC和对比鱼塘(CFP),以及在淹没区中的SDPC,它们可以在采煤塌陷区演替过程中用作过渡系统。基于能值的指数,比率和三元图可用于评估这三个系统的行为。能值分析非常适合此任务,因为它能够将所有能量,材料和信息转换为通用的质量单位,从而可以对三个系统进行深入比较。结果表明SDPC最依赖可再生资源,并且尽力保持能量和物质流调节的自然机制。因此,SDPC在生物能源使用和环境负荷水平方面具有更高的能效效率。 CFP更加依赖购买的投入和来自外部的不可再生投入的比例。这三个系统的可持续性指数值介于稳定沉降区域CFP的0.82,淹没区域SDPC的4.31和稳定沉降区域SDPC的9.12之间。结果证实,在采煤塌陷区,SDPC比CFP减轻了对环境的压力,更具可持续性。此外,稳定沉降区SDPC的每个系统的生态系统服务价值分别为1.52E + 17 sej / yr / ha,淹没区SDPC的每个系统的生态系统服务价值分别为2.90E + 16 sej / yr / ha / ha,为10.1。和CFP值分别高1.9倍。这项研究表明,通过食物网支持整个生态系统的植被,动物群落和功能水文学可以在SDPC中恢复,恢复的湿地可以通过其生态服务和功能的恢复而提供经济和生态效益。在该地区发现了濒临灭绝的稀有物种,例如巴尔潜果(Aythya baeri)和芦苇鹦鹉(Paradoxornis heudei),这些物种的前景取决于中国采煤塌陷区的未来恢复政策。为了保护生物多样性,SDPC应该比其他开垦方法更受青睐。这项工作将为环境政策制定提供参考,并用于向政府推荐更好的管理实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号