首页> 外文期刊>Ecological indicators >Spatial trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services within a global biodiversity hotspot
【24h】

Spatial trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services within a global biodiversity hotspot

机译:全球生物多样性热点内生态系统服务之间的空间取舍和协同作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Managing multiple ecosystem services (ESs) in a win-win manner is a necessary and challenging task. However, our understanding of the spatial interactions among ESs is relatively limited, particularly in mountainous areas. Using the global biodiversity hotspot known as the Three Parallel Rivers Region in Southwest China as a case study, this paper systematically investigated the spatial trade-offs and synergies among 8 ESs (i.e. crop production, livestock-raising, water supply, carbon storage, carbon sequestration, soil retention, habitat support and nature recreation). We mapped the township-level distributions of the 8 ESs and measured their relationships using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients and overlap analyses of ES hotspots/coldspots. Four types of ES bundles were identified by applying the K-means clustering analysis to the 8 ESs. Our results revealed high to moderate levels of interactions among most pairs of ESs. Most provisioning services showed trade-offs with ESs of the other categories, whereas most regulating services demonstrated synergies with other ESs. The ES bundles presented a reasonable set of ecological zones that were characterized by the provisions of different ESs. The spatial patterns of ESs and their interactions corresponded well to the regional socio-ecological gradients in topography, climate and human activities. Our results should have important applications in regional decision makings on economic development and environmental conservation. This study also provides a good case for demonstrating the complex relationships among ESs in a typical mountainous biodiversity hotspot.
机译:以双赢的方式管理多种生态系统服务(ESs)是一项必要且具有挑战性的任务。但是,我们对ES之间的空间相互作用的理解相对有限,尤其是在山区。本文以中国西南三大平行河地区为代表的全球生物多样性热点地区,系统地研究了8个生态系统(作物生产,畜牧业,供水,碳储量,碳储量)之间的空间权衡和协同作用。固存,土壤保留,栖息地支持和自然娱乐)。我们绘制了8个ES的乡镇分布图,并使用Spearman等级相关系数和ES热点/热点的重叠分析来测量它们之间的关系。通过将K-means聚类分析应用于8个ES,可以识别出四种ES束。我们的结果表明,大多数ES对之间的互动程度都很高到中等。大多数配置服务显示出与其他类别的ES之间的权衡,而大多数监管服务显示出与其他ES的协同作用。 ES捆绑包提供了一组合理的生态区,以不同ES的提供为特征。 ES的空间格局及其相互作用与地形,气候和人类活动中的区域社会生态梯度非常吻合。我们的结果应在经济发展和环境保护的区域决策中具有重要的应用价值。这项研究也为说明典型山区生物多样性热点地区ES之间的复杂关系提供了一个很好的案例。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ecological indicators》 |2018年第1期|371-381|共11页
  • 作者单位

    Yunnan Univ, Yunnan Key Lab Int Rivers & Transboundary Ecosecu, Conservat Biogeog Res Grp, Kunming 650091, Yunnan, Peoples R China;

    Yunnan Univ, Yunnan Key Lab Int Rivers & Transboundary Ecosecu, Conservat Biogeog Res Grp, Kunming 650091, Yunnan, Peoples R China;

    Yunnan Univ, Yunnan Key Lab Int Rivers & Transboundary Ecosecu, Conservat Biogeog Res Grp, Kunming 650091, Yunnan, Peoples R China;

    Yunnan Univ, Yunnan Key Lab Int Rivers & Transboundary Ecosecu, Conservat Biogeog Res Grp, Kunming 650091, Yunnan, Peoples R China;

    Yunnan Univ, Yunnan Key Lab Int Rivers & Transboundary Ecosecu, Conservat Biogeog Res Grp, Kunming 650091, Yunnan, Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Ecosystem service bundles; Spatial interactions; Hotspots/coldspots; Biodiversity conservation; Mountainous areas; Three Parallel Rivers Region;

    机译:生态系统服务包;空间相互作用;热点/冷点;生物多样性保护;山地地区;三大平行河流地区;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号