首页> 外文期刊>Ecological Economics >A comparison of life cycle cost analyses for a typical college dormitory using subsidized versus full-cost pricing of water
【24h】

A comparison of life cycle cost analyses for a typical college dormitory using subsidized versus full-cost pricing of water

机译:典型大学宿舍使用补贴水价与全价水的生命周期成本分析的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study examines the impact of public policy on life cycle cost analyses for a hypothetical high-density residential dormitory. The specific public policy decisions considered in this study are (1) operating subsidies for municipal water production and treatment, (2) capital subsidies in the form of infrastructure grants to municipal water districts from state and federal governments, (3) deferred recapitalization and maintenance, and (4) technology improvements required by more stringent water quality standards. These four public policy influences create market imperfections, which "artificially" alter the price of water from its natural equilibrium. In this study, market imperfections are factored into the current consumer price of water to determine the full-cost price in four distinct municipalities. Results suggest that market imperfections created by public policy tend to undervalue life cycle cost analyses for efficient solutions. Implications of the results for researchers, public-policy makers, and management educators are discussed.
机译:这项研究研究了假设的高密度住宅宿舍的公共政策对生命周期成本分析的影响。本研究中考虑的具体公共政策决策是(1)市政用水生产和处理的运营补贴;(2)州和联邦政府以市政基础设施赠款形式提供的资本补贴;(3)延期的资本重组和维护,以及(4)更严格的水质标准要求的技术改进。这四种公共政策的影响造成了市场缺陷,从而“人为地”改变了水的自然平衡价格。在这项研究中,市场不完美因素被纳入当前的用水价格中,以确定四个不同城市的全成本价格。结果表明,公共政策造成的市场缺陷往往会低估有效解决方案的生命周期成本分析。讨论了结果对研究人员,公共政策制定者和管理教育者的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号