首页> 外文期刊>Ecological Economics >Industrial Output Restriction And The Kyoto Protocol: An Input-output Approach With Application To Canada
【24h】

Industrial Output Restriction And The Kyoto Protocol: An Input-output Approach With Application To Canada

机译:工业产出限制与《京都议定书》:一种投入产出方法及其在加拿大的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The objective of this paper is to assess the economic impacts of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by decreasing industrial output in Canada to a level that will meet the target set out in the Kyoto Protocol. The study uses an ecological-economic Input-Output model combining economic components valued in monetary terms with ecologic components -GHG emissions - expressed in physical terms. Economic and greenhouse gas emissions data for Canada are computed in the same sectoral disaggregation. Three policy scenarios are considered: the first one uses the direct emission coefficients to allocate the reduction in industrial output, while the other two use the direct plus indirect emission coefficients. In the first two scenarios, the reduction in industrial sector output is allocated uniformly across sectors while it is allocated to the 12 largest emitting industries in the last one. The estimated impacts indicate that the results vary with the different allocation methods. The third policy scenario, allocation to the 12 largest emitting sectors, is the most cost effective of the three as the impacts of the Kyoto Protocol reduces Gross Domestic Product by 3.1% compared to 24% and 8.1% in the first two scenarios. Computed economic costs should be considered as upper-bounds because the model assumes immediate adjustment to the Kyoto Protocol and because flexibility mechanisms are not incorporated. The resulting upper-bound impact of the third scenario may seem to contradict those who claim that the Kyoto Protocol would place an unbearable burden on the Canadian economy.
机译:本文的目的是通过将加拿大的工业产值降低到可以达到《京都议定书》所设定的目标,来评估减少温室气体排放的经济影响。该研究使用了一种生态经济投入产出模型,该模型结合了以货币计算的经济成分和以物理术语表示的生态成分-温室气体排放量。加拿大的经济和温室气体排放数据是按同一部门分类来计算的。考虑了三个政策方案:第一个使用直接排放系数来分配工业产出的减少,而其他两个使用直接加间接排放系数。在前两种情况中,工业部门产出的减少在各个部门之间是均匀分配的,而在最后一个方面则分配给了12个最大的排放行业。估计的影响表明结果随分配方法的不同而不同。第三种政策方案是分配给12个最大的排放部门,是三个方案中最具成本效益的,因为《京都议定书》的影响使国内生产总值减少了3.1%,而前两种方案分别为24%和8.1%。计算的经济成本应被视为上限,因为该模型假设立即对《京都议定书》进行了调整,并且未纳入灵活性机制。第三种情况的最终影响似乎与那些声称《京都议定书》将给加拿大经济造成难以承受的负担的人相矛盾。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号