首页> 外文期刊>Ecological Economics >Combining income and assets measures to include the transitory nature of poverty in assessments of forest dependence: Evidence from the Democratic Republic of Congo
【24h】

Combining income and assets measures to include the transitory nature of poverty in assessments of forest dependence: Evidence from the Democratic Republic of Congo

机译:结合收入和资产措施,将贫困的暂时性纳入森林依赖评估:来自刚果民主共和国的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A considerable amount of research on poverty-environment relations in developing countries under the CIFOR-PEN initiative focuses on household income generation from forests, using total annual income as a measure of poverty. However, income alone produces a static picture in a snapshot of time while poverty is a dynamic state that can be a transitory phenomenon. Using income only also fails to consider that households can liquidate asset to overcome income shocks. Here we show that using asset quintiles, measured by value of assets, produce a distinctly different pattern than the commonly observed negative relation between income and forest dependence. We then present an approach, enabling categorization of households as chronic or transient poor, transient rich and rich providing a more nuanced picture than that provided by CIFOR-PEN studies so far. The validity of groupings is tested by comparing household characteristics and exposure to shocks. We then show that the chronic poor are most reliant on forest income, while the transient poor consume a higher share of harvested forest products. The transient rich have higher agricultural productivity and absolute forest income. Rich households relies more on business. Based on the results we suggest recommendations for improving future studies on poverty-environment relations.
机译:在CIFOR-PEN倡议下,发展中国家对贫困与环境的关系进行了大量研究,重点是利用森林的年收入作为总收入的衡量标准。但是,仅收入就可以在时间的快照中生成静态图像,而贫困是一种动态状态,可能是暂时现象。仅使用收入也没有考虑到家庭可以清算资产来克服收入冲击。在这里,我们表明,使用按资产价值衡量的资产五分位数产生的模式明显不同于通常观察到的收入与森林依赖之间的负关系。然后,我们提出一种方法,可以将家庭归类为慢性或暂时性贫困,暂时性富裕和富裕家庭,从而提供比迄今为止CIFOR-PEN研究所提供的更为细微的描述。通过比较家庭特征和遭受冲击的程度来测试分组的有效性。然后,我们表明,长期贫困人口最依赖于森林收入,而临时贫困人口则消耗了更多的森林产品。过渡富人具有较高的农业生产力和绝对森林收入。富裕家庭更加依赖业务。根据这些结果,我们提出了一些建议,以改进未来对贫困与环境关系的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号