...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecological Economics >Adoption of Energy Efficiency Measures for Non-residential Buildings: Technological and Organizational Heterogeneity in the Trade, Commerce and Services Sector
【24h】

Adoption of Energy Efficiency Measures for Non-residential Buildings: Technological and Organizational Heterogeneity in the Trade, Commerce and Services Sector

机译:通过非住宅建筑的节能措施:贸易,商业和服务业的技术和组织异质性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Drawing on agency theory and absorptive capacity literature, this paper empirically analyzes factors of adoption and barriers to adoption of four crosscutting, ancillary energy efficiency measures (EEMs) for non-residential buildings (efficient lighting, building insulation, heating system replacement, and optimization of heating system operations). The empirical analysis employs a large representative sample of organizations in the German trade, commerce and services sector. Results from econometric analyses provide evidence for a negative effect of principal agent relationships (landlord-tenant; owner-user of energy supply equipment; parent-subsidiary) and for a positive effect of organizational attributes that contribute to absorptive capacity (energy manager in place; energy audit conducted; experience with decentralized low carbon energy). However, the significance of these effects varies by measure. For non-adopters, heterogeneity of crosscutting ancillary EEMs has little impact on the ranking of barriers to adoption. The most relevant barriers for all EEMs are rented spaces, high investment costs, and other priorities; least relevant are technical risk to production and risk to product quality. Finally, we find little evidence for differences in the factors of adoption and barriers to adoption between manufacturing and non-manufacturing organizations. These findings are robust to alternative model specifications.(C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:借助代理理论和吸收能力文献,本文对非住宅建筑的四种横切,辅助能效措施(EEM)(有效照明,建筑隔热,供暖系统更换和​​优化改造)进行了采用的因素和采用的障碍的经验分析。加热系统操作)。实证分析采用了德国贸易,商业和服务业中的大量代表性组织样本。计量经济学分析的结果为主要代理人关系(房客,能源供应设备的所有者-用户,父母-子公司)的负面影响以及有助于吸收能力的组织属性的积极影响提供证据(能源经理到位;进行能源审计;具有分散式低碳能源的经验)。但是,这些影响的重要性因度量而异。对于非采用者,横切辅助EEM的异质性对采用障碍的等级影响不大。对于所有EEM而言,最相关的障碍是租赁空间,高投资成本和其他优先事项;最不相关的是对生产的技术风险和对产品质量的风险。最后,我们发现几乎没有证据表明制造组织和非制造组织之间在采用因素和采用障碍方面存在差异。这些发现对于替代模型规范而言是可靠的。(C)2017 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ecological Economics》 |2017年第6期|240-254|共15页
  • 作者单位

    Grenoble Ecole Management, Dept Management Technol & Strategy, 12 Rue Pierre Semard, F-38000 Grenoble, France;

    Grenoble Ecole Management, Dept Management Technol & Strategy, 12 Rue Pierre Semard, F-38000 Grenoble, France|Fraunhofer Inst Syst & Innovat Res, Dept Energy Policy & Energy Mkt, Breslauer Str 48, D-76139 Karlsruhe, Germany|Virginia Polytech Inst & State Univ, Dept Agr & Appl Econ, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA;

    Fraunhofer Inst Syst & Innovat Res, Dept Energy Policy & Energy Mkt, Breslauer Str 48, D-76139 Karlsruhe, Germany;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Energy efficiency; Barriers; Agency; Absorptive capacity; Adoption; SMEs;

    机译:能源效率;壁垒;机构;吸收能力;采用;中小企业;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号