首页> 外文期刊>Ecological Economics >Difference in Preferences or Multiple Preference Orderings? Comparing Choices of Environmental Bureaucrats, Recreational Anglers, and the Public
【24h】

Difference in Preferences or Multiple Preference Orderings? Comparing Choices of Environmental Bureaucrats, Recreational Anglers, and the Public

机译:首选项或多个首选项顺序不同?比较环境官僚,休闲钓鱼者和公众的选择

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Do Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) bureaucrats represent the general public or are they more in line with an interest group? We study preferences for environmental policy using a choice experiment (CE) on three populations; the general public, Swedish EPA bureaucrats, and recreational anglers. We also test for existence of multiple preference orderings: Half of the respondents were asked to choose the alternatives that best corresponded with their opinion, and the other half was asked to take the role of a policy-maker and make recommendations for environmental policy. The SEPA bureaucrats have the highest marginal willingness to pay (MWTP) to improve environmental quality. Differences in MWTP are robust and not due to differences in socio-economic characteristics across the populations. We only found weak evidence of multiple preference orderings.
机译:环境保护署(EPA)的官僚代表一般公众吗?还是更符合某个利益集团的立场?我们使用三个群体的选择实验(CE)研究环境政策的偏好;公众,瑞典EPA官员和休闲垂钓者。我们还测试了多个优先顺序的存在:要求一半的受访者选择最符合其观点的替代方案,另一半则要求其充当决策者的角色并为环境政策提出建议。 SEPA官僚具有改善环境质量的最高边际支付意愿(MWTP)。 MWTP的差异是有力的,而不是由于人群中社会经济特征的差异。我们仅发现多重偏好排序的微弱证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号