首页> 外文期刊>East Asia >Is institutionalization of the six-party talks possible?
【24h】

Is institutionalization of the six-party talks possible?

机译:六方会谈的制度化可能吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

During 2003 and 2004, after having successfully hosted two six-party talks and a round of working-group level meetings on the North Korean nuclear crisis, China pushed to institutionalize the talks. Such an initiative coming from China was a shock to the world, since it has long maintained a passive, negative and defensive posture against multilateral cooperative security arrangements. This article declares that China's idea to utilize the six-party talks as a steppingstone toward a multilateral cooperative security arrangement is premature. It argues that the first priority is to address the failure of the 1994 Agreed Framework with North Korea—what was, then, believed to be the solution for the North Korean nuclear crisis. This article dissects the failure and identifies one critical factor for the viability of any future peaceful resolution—the economic sanctions that the US has placed against North Korea for the past half-century. The authors argues that if the issue of sanctions is not addressed, the current six-party talks will not be successful.
机译:2003年和2004年,中国成功举办了两次关于朝鲜核危机的六方对话和一次工作组级会议,之后,中国推动了对话的制度化。来自中国的这一倡议震惊了世界,因为它长期以来对多边合作安全安排保持被动,消极和防御的姿态。本文宣称,中国利用六党对话作为迈向多边合作安全安排的垫脚石的想法还为时过早。它辩称,当务之急是解决与朝鲜达成的1994年《框架协议》的失败-当时认为这是解决朝鲜核危机的解决方案。本文剖析了失败的原因,并指出了任何未来和平解决方案的可行性的关键因素,即过去半个世纪以来美国对朝鲜的经济制裁。作者认为,如果不解决制裁问题,当前的六方会谈将不会成功。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号