首页> 外文期刊>Earth, Moon, and Planets >The Changes of the Orbital Elements and Estimation of the Initial Velocities of Stream Meteoroids Ejected from Comets and Asteroids
【24h】

The Changes of the Orbital Elements and Estimation of the Initial Velocities of Stream Meteoroids Ejected from Comets and Asteroids

机译:彗星和小行星射出的流类流星的轨道元素变化和初始速度估算

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The values of the initial velocity of the meteoroids ejected from the parent bodies are small and as a result, the most of the young meteoroid streams have similar orbits to their parent bodies. Assuming that the members of the observed meteor stream evolved under the influence of gravitational perturbations mostly, Pittich [1991, Proceedings of the Conference on Dynamic of Small Bodies of the Solar System, Polish-Slovak Conference, Warsaw, October 25–28, 1988, pp. 55-61], Williams [1996, Earth, Moon, Planets 72, 321–326; 2001, Proceedings of the Meteoroids 2001 conference, Kiruna, Sweden, August 6–10, 2001, pp. 33–42] estimated the ejection velocities of the stream meteoroids. Equation relating the ejection velocity Δυ and the change Δa of the semi-major axis, Williams (2001), was applied with two slightly different variations. In the first one (M1) as Δa the difference between the mean orbit of the stream and the orbit of the parent body was substituted, in the second one (M2), as Δa the dispersion of semi-major axes around the mean orbit of the stream was used. The results obtained by these two methods are not free from discrepancies, partly explained by the particular orbital structure of the stream. Kresak [1992, Contrib. Astron. Obs. Skalnate Pleso 22, 123–130] strongly criticized the attempts to determine the initial velocities of the stream using the statistics of the meteor orbits. He argued that this is essentially impossible, because the dispersion of the initial velocities are masked by much larger measuring errors and by the accumulated effects of planetary perturbations. In our paper, we study the reliability of M1 and M2 methods. We made a numerical experiment consisting of formation of several meteor streams and their dynamical evolution over 5000 years. We ejected meteoroids particles from the comets: 1P/Halley, 2P/Encke, 55P/Tempel-Tuttle, 109P/Swift-Tuttle and from minor planets (3200) Phaethon and 2002 SY50. During the integration, the ejection velocities were estimated using both M1 and M2 methods. The results show that the velocities obtained by M1 method are unstable: too high or too low, when compared with the known ejection velocities at the time of the stream formation. On the other hand, the velocities obtained using M2 method are too small, mostly. In principle, M2 estimates the dispersion of the distribution of the ejection velocities around the mean value, not the mean value itself. Applying more accurate Equation relating Δυ and Δa we decreased the bias of the results, but not their variation observed during the evolution of the streams and the parent bodies. We have found that the variability of the estimated ejection velocities was caused mainly by the gravitational changes of the semi-major axis and eccentricity of the parent body. In brief, we have found that the reliability of the results obtained by M1 or M2 method are low, and have to be used with great care.
机译:从母体射出的流星体的初始速度值很小,因此,大多数年轻的流星体流具有与其母体相似的轨道。假设观测到的流星的流星大部分是在重力扰动的影响下演化的,Pittich [1991年,太阳系小体动力学会议论文集,波兰-斯洛伐克会议,华沙,1988年10月25日至28日, pp。55-61],Williams [1996,Earth,Moon,Planets 72,321–326; 2001,《 2001年流星体会议论文集》,瑞典基律纳,2001年8月6日至10日,第33–42页]估计了流星体的喷射速度。涉及喷射速度Δυ和半长轴变化Δa的方程式Williams(2001)应用了两个略有不同的变化。在第一个(M1)中,将流的平均轨道与母体轨道之间的差值作为Δa,在第二个(M2)中,将半长轴的绕其平均轨道的分散作为Δa。使用了流。通过这两种方法获得的结果并非没有差异,部分原因是物流的特定轨道结构所致。 Kresak [1992,Contrib。阿斯特隆观察Skalnate Pleso 22,123–130]强烈批评了使用流星轨道的统计数据确定流的初始速度的尝试。他认为这基本上是不可能的,因为初始速度的离散被更大的测量误差和行星扰动的累积效应所掩盖。在本文中,我们研究了M1和M2方法的可靠性。我们进行了一个数值实验,包括几个流星流的形成及其在5000年内的动态演变。我们从彗星:1P / Halley,2P / Encke,55P / Tempel-Tuttle,109P / Swift-Tuttle以及小行星(3200)Phaethon和2002 SY50 中弹出了流星体粒子。在积分过程中,使用M1和M2方法估计喷射速度。结果表明,与流形成时已知的喷射速度相比,通过M1方法获得的速度不稳定:太高或太低。另一方面,使用M2方法获得的速度大多太小。原则上,M2估计喷射速度分布的平均值附近的分散,而不是平均值本身。应用与Δυ和Δa相关的更精确的方程式,我们减小了结果的偏差,但没有减小在溪流和母体演化过程中观察到的偏差。我们发现,估计喷射速度的变化主要是由半长轴的重力变化和母体的偏心引起的。简而言之,我们发现通过M1或M2方法获得的结果的可靠性很低,必须谨慎使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号