首页> 外文期刊>Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory >Dangerous classes: tracing back an epistemological fear
【24h】

Dangerous classes: tracing back an epistemological fear

机译:危险阶级:追溯认识论上的恐惧

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The article focuses on the nineteenth century fear of the ‘dangerous classes’. From the dangerous classes - all social scientists agreed - emanated a fundamental threat to society. However, corresponding to this seemingly social threat, on a much deeper level an epistemological threat was caused by the dangerous classes as well. The epistemological fear of the dangerous classes - this is the thesis - results from the confrontation of the researcher with an object of analysis that keeps withdrawing itself from any analytical fixation and adjustment as such. In the article particularly three aspects of this epistemological fear - the fear of heterogeneity, of a levelling of borders and of hybridization - are presented and contextualized within a wider epistemological horizon, namely the nineteenth century ideal of objectivity. The last chapter of the article outlines what seems to be a reactualization of the notion of the dangerous classes within current social theories on urban violence and exclusion. In reference to Deleuze and Guattari's nomadology as well as Hardt and Negri's concept of the multitude I want to call attention to what seems to be an affirmative reinterpretation of the notion of thedangerous classes in post-structuralist theories. Thus, by virtually taking the current usage of the notion of the dangerous classes seriously, I want to emphasize the possibility to epistemically sharpen post-structuralist analyses of contemporary social caesurae and ruptures precisely by reading them against the negative background of the nineteenth century fear of the dangerous classes.View full textDownload full textKeywordsdangerous classes, Deleuze and Guattari, epistemology, exclusion, Frégier, Hardt and Negri, Mayhew, objectivity, pauperismRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2011.572716
机译:本文重点介绍19世纪对“危险阶级”的恐惧。所有社会科学家都同意,从危险的阶级出发,对社会构成了根本威胁。但是,与这种看似社会的威胁相对应,在更深层次上,危险阶级也造成了认识论上的威胁。对危险类别的认识论恐惧-这是论文-是由于研究人员与分析对象的对抗而产生的,这种分析对象不断使自己脱离任何分析固定和调整。在这篇文章中,特别提出了认识论恐惧的三个方面,即对异质性的恐惧,对边界的平整和对杂交的恐惧,并在更广阔的认识论视野中,即在十九世纪的客观性理想中进行了情境化。本文的最后一章概述了在当前关于城市暴力和排斥的社会理论中,危险阶级的概念似乎是一种反作用。关于德勒兹和瓜塔里的游牧学以及哈特和尼格里的众多概念,我想提请注意似乎是对后结构主义理论中危险阶级概念的肯定性重新解释。因此,通过认真对待当前对危险阶级概念的实际使用,我想强调一下通过在十九世纪对恐惧的消极背景下进行解读来认识论上地加强后结构主义对当代社会凯撒和破裂的分析的可能性。查看全文下载全文关键词危险类别,德勒兹(Deleuze)和瓜塔里(Guattari),认识论,排斥,弗雷吉尔(Frégier),哈特和尼格里(Negri),梅休(Mayhew),客观性,贫民症相关的var addthis_config = { netvibes,twitter,technorati,可口,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2011.572716

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号