...
首页> 外文期刊>IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation >Comparison of maximum likelihood unbiasing methods for the estimation of the Weibull parameters
【24h】

Comparison of maximum likelihood unbiasing methods for the estimation of the Weibull parameters

机译:估计威布尔参数的最大似然无偏方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The technique of unbiasing the maximum likelihood estimates of the scale and shape parameters of the Weibull function is discussed. The efficiency of recent and traditional unbiasing estimators is critically compared. In particular, the Bain-Engelhardt, Harter & Moore and Ross unbiasing methods are considered, together with the Jacquelin estimators. The behavior of these estimators and unbiasing factors is investigated as function of the sample size and the value of the shape parameter. It is shown that some procedures are actually not unbiasing at all but, depending on the value of the shape parameter and the sample size, can even make the ML estimates worse. The unbiasing factors proposed by Ross and Harter and Moore seem the most effective for the shape and scale parameters, respectively. When using the unbiasing factors on the point estimates, rather than on the expected values, it is found that these methods tend to lose their accuracy in some cases.
机译:讨论了不偏倚的威布尔函数的规模和形状参数的最大似然估计的技术。严格比较了最近的和传统的无偏估计量的效率。特别是,考虑了Bain-Engelhardt,Harter&Moore和Ross无偏方法以及Jacquelin估计量。这些估计量和无偏因子的行为作为样本大小和形状参数值的函数进行研究。结果表明,某些程序实际上并不是完全无偏的,而是取决于形状参数的值和样本量,甚至会使ML估计更糟。 Ross和Harter和Moore提出的无偏因素似乎分别对形状和比例参数最有效。当在点估计而不是期望值上使用无偏因子时,发现这些方法在某些情况下往往会失去其准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号