首页> 外文期刊>Dialectical Anthropology >The Privatisation of Home and Hope: Return, Reforms and the Foreign Intervention in Bosnia-Herzegovina
【24h】

The Privatisation of Home and Hope: Return, Reforms and the Foreign Intervention in Bosnia-Herzegovina

机译:家庭和希望的私有化:波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那的回归,改革和外国干预

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Contextualising the foreign-imposed return policies in early post-war Bosnia-Herzegovina, this article argues that the return of the displaced – however important it was to many Bosnians – ultimately functioned as the self-perpetuating lynchpin of an externally generated framework for post-war reconstruction, often out of tune with the hopes of its intended beneficiaries. Rather than following conventional anthropological cultural relativist arguments, I propose a critique of the foreign intervention that places it in its social, political and economic context, drawing attention to patterns of longing and belonging in Bosnia-Herzegovina. I contrast the groundings and implications of intervention policies with the experiences and yearnings of displaced Bosnians and show that, while it was legitimised as the implementation of an ostensibly ideologically neutral human rights discourse, the foreign emphasis on property and safety rights over other concerns channelled the reconstruction of Bosnia-Herzegovina into a peculiar, normative trajectory of postsocialist neoliberalisation.
机译:结合战后波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那早期实行的外国强加的回返政策,本文认为,流离失所者的回返-对许多波斯尼亚人来说多么重要-最终充当了外部产生的战后框架的自我延续的关键。战争重建,往往与其预期受益者的希望不符。我没有遵循传统的人类学文化相对论主义者的论点,而是提出了对外国干预的批评,将其置于社会,政治和经济背景下,提请人们注意波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那的渴望和归属模式。我将干预政策的基础和影响与流离失所的波斯尼亚人的经验和向往作了比较,并表明,尽管将其合法化为实施表面上意识形态上的中性人权话语,但外国人对财产和安全权的重视超过了对其他问题的关注。将波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那重建为后社会主义新自由化的特殊规范性轨迹。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号