首页> 外文期刊>Dialectical Anthropology >Toward conservational anthropology: addressing anthropocentric bias in anthropology
【24h】

Toward conservational anthropology: addressing anthropocentric bias in anthropology

机译:走向保护人类学:解决人类学中以人类为中心的偏见

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Anthropological literature addressing conservation and development often blames ‘conservationists’ as being neo-imperialist in their attempts to institute limits to commercial activities by imposing their post-materialist eco-ideology. The author argues that this view of conservationists is ironic in light of the fact that the very notion of ‘development’ is arguably an imposition of the (Western) elites. The anthropocentric bias in anthropology also permeates constructivist ethnographies of human–animal ‘interactions,’ which tend to emphasize the socio-cultural complexity and interconnectivity rather than the unequal and often extractive nature of this ‘interaction.’ Anthropocentrism is argued to be counteractive to reconciling conservationists’ efforts at environmental protection with the traditional ontologies of the interdependency of human-nature relationship.
机译:有关保护与发展的人类学文献经常指责“保护主义者”为新帝国主义,他们试图通过施加后物质主义的生态意识来限制商业活动。作者认为,鉴于“发展”这一概念可以说是(西方)精英的强加,这一保守主义者的观点具有讽刺意味。人类学中以人类为中心的偏见也渗透到人类-动物“互动”的建构主义民族志中,这种民族志倾向于强调社会文化的复杂性和相互联系,而不是强调这种“互动”的不平等且通常是提取性。人类中心主义被认为对和解具有反作用。自然主义者在人与自然关系的相互依存的传统本体论下,环境保护主义者在环境保护方面的努力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号