首页> 外文期刊>Diabetes >BMI as a Modifiable Risk Factor for Type 2 Diabetes: Refining and Understanding Causal Estimates Using Mendelian Randomization
【24h】

BMI as a Modifiable Risk Factor for Type 2 Diabetes: Refining and Understanding Causal Estimates Using Mendelian Randomization

机译:BMI作为2型糖尿病的可修正危险因素:使用孟德尔随机化法细化和理解因果估计

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study focused on resolving the relationship between BMI and type 2 diabetes. The availability of multiple variants associated with BMI offers a new chance to resolve the true causal effect of BMI on type 2 diabetes; however, the properties of these associations and their validity as genetic instruments need to be considered alongside established and new methods for undertaking Mendelian randomization (MR). We explore the potential for pleiotropic genetic variants to generate bias, revise existing estimates, and illustrate value in new analysis methods. A two-sample MR approach with 96 genetic variants was used with three different analysis methods, two of which (MR-Egger and the weighted median) have been developed specifically to address problems of invalid instrumental variables. We estimate an odds ratio for type 2 diabetes per unit increase in BMI (kg/m~2) of between 1.19 and 1.38, with the most stable estimate using all instruments and a weighted median approach (1.26 [95% Cl 1.17,1.34]). TCF7L2(rs7903146) was identified as a complex effect or pleiotropic instrument, and removal of this variant resulted in convergence of causal effect estimates from different causal analysis methods. This indicated the potential for pleiotropy to affect estimates and differences in performance of alternative analytical methods. In a real type 2 diabetes-focused example, this study demonstrates the potential impact of invalid instruments on causal effect estimates and the potential for new approaches to mitigate the bias caused.
机译:这项研究的重点是解决BMI与2型糖尿病之间的关系。与BMI相关的多种变异的可用性为解决BMI对2型糖尿病的真正因果关系提供了新的机会。但是,这些联系的性质及其作为遗传工具的有效性需要与建立孟德尔随机化(MR)的既定和新方法一起考虑。我们探索了多效遗传变异产生偏见,修改现有估计并在新分析方法中说明价值的潜力。两种具有96个遗传变异的MR方法与三种不同的分析方法一起使用,其中两种方法(MR-Egger和加权中位数)专门用于解决无效工具变量的问题。我们估计BMI(kg / m〜2)每增加2种2型糖尿病的比值比在1.19和1.38之间,使用所有工具和加权中位数方法得出的最稳定估计值(1.26 [95%Cl 1.17,1.34] )。 TCF7L2(rs7903146)被鉴定为复杂效应或多效性手段,去除此变异导致不同因果分析方法对因果效应估计的收敛。这表明多效性有可能影响其他分析方法的估计和性能差异。在一个以2型糖尿病为重点的真实例子中,这项研究证明了无效仪器对因果效应估计的潜在影响,以及采用新方法减轻造成的偏见的潜力。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Diabetes》 |2016年第10期|3002-3007|共6页
  • 作者单位

    MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, U.K.;

    MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, U.K.;

    MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, U.K.;

    MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, U.K.,Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K.;

    MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, U.K.,MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, Cambridge, U.K.;

    MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, U.K.;

    MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, U.K.;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 03:46:11

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号