首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology >The Effects of Short-Term High-Intensity Interval Training and Moderate Intensity Continuous Training on Body Fat Percentage, Abdominal Circumference, BMI and VO 2max in Overweight Subjects
【24h】

The Effects of Short-Term High-Intensity Interval Training and Moderate Intensity Continuous Training on Body Fat Percentage, Abdominal Circumference, BMI and VO 2max in Overweight Subjects

机译:短期高强度间隔训练和中等强度连续训练对体脂百分比,腹周,BMI和VO 2MAX的影响,超重主题

获取原文
           

摘要

We aimed to compare the effects of a personalized short-term high-intensity interval training (HIIT) vs. standard moderate intensity continuous training (MICT) on body fat percentage, abdominal circumference, BMI and maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) in overweight volunteers. Twenty overweight sedentary volunteers (24.9 ± 2.9y; BMI: 26.1 ± 1 kgm?2) were randomly assigned to 2 groups, HIIT or MICT. HIIT trained 6 weeks (3-days/week), 40-min sessions as follows: 6-min warm-up, 20-min resistance training (RT) at 70% 1-RM, 8-min HIIT up to 90% of the predicted Maximal Heart Rate (HRmax), 6-min cool-down. MICT trained 6 weeks (3-days/week) 60-min sessions as follows: 6-min warm-up, 20-min RT at 70% 1-RM, 30-min MICT at 60–70% of the predicted HRmax, 4-min cool-down. Two-way ANOVA was performed in order to compare the efficacy of HIIT and MICT protocols, and no significant interaction between training x time was evidenced (p 0.05), indicating similar effects of both protocols on all parameters analyzed. Interestingly, the comparison of Δ mean percentage revealed an improvement in VO2max (p = 0.05) together with a positive trend in the reduction of fat mass percentage (p = 0.06) in HIIT compared to MICT protocol. In conclusion, 6 weeks of personalized HIIT, with reduced training time (40 vs. 60 min)/session and volume of training/week, improved VO2max and reduced fat mass percentage more effectively compared to MICT. These positive results encourage us to test this training in a larger population.
机译:我们旨在比较个性化短期高强度间隔训练(HIIT)与标准中等强度连续训练(MICT)对体脂百分比,腹周,BMI和最大氧气摄取(VO2MAX)的效果对超重志愿者的影响。二十个超重久坐不动志愿者(24.9±2.9y; BMI:26.1±1 kgm?2)被随机分配给2组,HIIT或MICT。 HIIT培训6周(3天/周),40分钟的课程如下:6分钟预热,20分钟的电阻训练(RT)为70%1-RM,8分钟高达90%预测的最大心率(HRMAX),6分钟冷却。 Mict培训6周(3天/周)60分钟的课程如下:6分钟预热,20分钟的室温,70%1-RM,30分钟的监控,占预测HRMAX的60-70%, 4分钟冷却。进行双向ANOVA以比较HIIT和MICT协议的功效,并且证明了训练X时间之间没有显着的相互作用(P> 0.05),表明两种协议对分析的所有参数的类似效果。有趣的是,δ平均百分比的比较揭示了Vo2max(p = 0.05)的改善,与MICT方案相比,HIT的脂肪质量百分比(P = 0.06)的阳性趋势在一起。总之,对于训练时间(40 vs.60分钟)/会话和培训/周的比较,与MICT相比,减少了训练时间(40腹部50分钟)/会话和体积,改善了vo2max和减少的脂肪质量百分比。这些积极的结果鼓励我们在更大的人口中测试这次培训。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号