首页> 外文期刊>Journal of physical activity & health >Comparison of High-Intensity Training Versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Body Fat Percentage in Persons With Overweight or Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
【24h】

Comparison of High-Intensity Training Versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training on Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Body Fat Percentage in Persons With Overweight or Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

机译:高强度训练与中等强度持续训练的高强度训练对具有超重或肥胖的人的心肺健身和体脂百分比:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: High-intensity training is comprised of sprint interval training (SIT) and high-intensity interval training (HIIT). This study compared high-intensity training with moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and body fat percentage for overweight or obese persons. Methods: A systematic search of randomized controlled trials using the health science databases occurred up to April, 2020. Twenty-six studies were included for complete analysis. A total of 784 participations were analyzed. The unstandardized mean difference for each outcome measurement was extracted from the studies and pooled with the random effects model. Results: MICT was significantly better at improving CRF compared with SIT (mean difference = -0.92; 95% confidence interval, -1.63 to -0.21; P=.01; I-2 = 10%). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between MICT versus HIIT on CRF (mean difference = -0.52; 95% confidence interval, -1.18 to 0.13; P=.12; I-2 = 23%). There was no significant difference in body fat percentage between MICT versus HIIT and MICT versus SIT. Conclusions: MICT was significantly better at improving CRF than SIT in overweight or obese persons.
机译:背景:高强度训练包括短跑间歇训练(SIT)和高强度间歇训练(HIIT)。本研究比较了高强度训练和中等强度持续训练(MICT)对超重或肥胖者的心肺健康(CRF)和体脂百分比的影响。方法:使用健康科学数据库对截至2020年4月的随机对照试验进行系统搜索。纳入26项研究进行完整分析。共分析了784名参与者。从研究中提取每个结果测量的非标准平均差,并与随机效应模型合并。结果:MICT在改善CRF方面明显优于SIT(平均差=-0.92;95%可信区间-1.63至-0.21;P=.01;I-2=10%)。此外,在CRF上,MICT和HIIT之间没有显著差异(平均差异=-0.52;95%置信区间,-1.18至0.13;P=.12;I-2=23%)。MICT与HIIT、MICT与SIT之间的体脂百分比没有显著差异。结论:在超重或肥胖人群中,MICT在改善CRF方面明显优于SIT。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号