...
首页> 外文期刊>Urban Science >Perception of Urban Green Areas Associated with Sociodemographic Affiliation, Structural Elements, and Acceptance Stripes
【24h】

Perception of Urban Green Areas Associated with Sociodemographic Affiliation, Structural Elements, and Acceptance Stripes

机译:与社会渗塑关系,结构元素和接受条纹相关的城市绿地的感知

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The extensification (opposite of intensification) of urban public green spaces offers great potential for conservation. One major issue for the long-term success of such a measure is, however, its acceptance by the urban population. This contribution presents the results of an image-based online questionnaire that we set to elucidate the role of sociodemographic affiliations regarding the perception of urban green areas. We also asked whether acceptability can be increased by the presence of additional structural elements (sculptures, benches) and “acceptance stripes”, i.e., stripes regularly mowed only at the margins of a natural green space. Regarding structural elements, 40- to 60-year-olds consistently rejected intensely maintained lawns and perceived a lawn as positive only in combination with a sculpture. A regularly mowed acceptance stripe resulted in a positive perception of natural meadows by people with an affinity for city life, classified based on their actual place of residence and/or their social dimension including aspects such as sense of place, familiarity, profession, and interests. Thus, decision-making processes of policy makers must be evaluated together with the urban population and should be assessed multidimensionally, i.e., by considering various criteria (e.g., ecological, social, and aesthetic aspects) in order to meet the requirements of residents and achieve an increase in biodiversity.
机译:城市公共绿地的扩展(与强化相反)提供了巨大的保护潜力。然而,这种措施的长期成功的一个主要问题是城市人口的接受。这一贡献介绍了基于图像的在线问卷的结果,我们设立了阐明了社会造成的联系对城市绿地的看法的作用。我们还询问是否可以通过额外的结构元素(雕塑,长凳)和“验收条纹”,即定期割草的边缘仅在天然绿色空间的边缘上增加可接受性。关于结构性要素,40至60岁的人一直被拒绝强烈地维持草坪,并将草坪感到肯定,只与雕塑相结合。经常割草的接受条纹导致对城市生活的亲和力的自然草地的积极看法,根据他们的实际居住地和/或其社会维度,包括地方,熟悉,职业和利益等方面。因此,必须与城市人口一起评估政策制定者的决策过程,并且应通过考虑各种标准(例如,生态,社会和审美方面)来评估,以满足居民的要求和实现增加生物多样性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号