首页> 外文期刊>Genealogy >Father Involvement, Care, and Breadwinning: Genealogies of Concepts and Revisioned Conceptual Narratives
【24h】

Father Involvement, Care, and Breadwinning: Genealogies of Concepts and Revisioned Conceptual Narratives

机译:父亲参与,护理和养类:概念和修改概念叙事的系谱

获取原文
       

摘要

This paper addresses an enduring puzzle in fathering research: Why are care and breadwinning largely configured as binary oppositions rather than as relational and intra-acting concepts and practices, as is often the case in research on mothering? Guided by Margaret Somers’ historical sociology of concept formation, I conduct a Foucauldian-inspired genealogy of the concept of “father involvement” as a cultural and historical object embedded in specific histories, conceptual networks, and social and conceptual narratives. With the aim of un-thinking and re-thinking conceptual possibilities that might expand knowledges about fathering, care, and breadwinning, I look to researchers in other sites who have drawn attention to the relationalities of care and earning. Specifically, I explore two conceptual pathways: First the concept of “material indirect care”, from fatherhood research pioneer Joseph Pleck, which envisages breadwinning as connected to care, and, in some contexts, as a form of care; and second, the concept of “provisioning” from the work of feminist economists, which highlights broad, interwoven patterns of care work and paid work. I argue that an approach to concepts that connect or entangle caring and breadwinning recognizes that people are care providers, care receivers, financial providers, and financial receivers in varied and multiple ways across time. This move is underpinned by, and can shift, our understandings of human subjectivity as relational and intra-dependent, with inevitable periods of dependency and vulnerability across the life course. Such a view also acknowledges the critical role of resources, services, and policies for supporting and sustaining the provisioning and caring activities of all parents, including fathers. Finally, I note the theoretical and political risks of this conceptual exercise, and the need for caution when making an argument about fathers’ breadwinning and caregiving entanglements.
机译:本文涉及培养研究的持久拼图:为什么要关心和养类,主要被配置为二元反对派,而不是作为关系和作用内的概念和实践,正如母亲的研究中的往往是往往的案例?由玛格丽特萨默尔斯的历史社会学的概念形成的历史社会学指导,我开展了“父亲参与”概念的Foucauldian启发系列,作为嵌入在特定历史,概念网络和社会和概念叙事中的文化和历史对象。旨在思考和重新思考的概念可能性,可能会扩大关于父亲,护理和养类的知识,我向其他网站的研究人员展望,他们引起了关注护理和收入的关系。具体来说,我探讨了两个概念途径:首先是“物质间接照顾”的概念,来自父亲研究先锋约瑟夫·泊位,以为养类为关怀,并且在某些情况下,作为一种护理形式;其次,来自女权主义经济学家的工作的“供应”的概念,突出了广泛,交织的护理工作和有偿工作。我认为,连接或缠绕关怀和饲料和养护的概念的方法认识到人们是关心提供者,护理接收者,金融提供者和金融接收者在跨时变化和多种方式。这一举措受到了对人类主体性的理解,依赖于关系和依赖的人类主体性的影响,在生活课程中不可避免的依赖和脆弱性。这种观点还承认资源,服务和支持和维持所有父母的供应和关怀活动的资源,服务和政策的关键作用。最后,我注意到这种概念练习的理论和政治风险,以及在讨论父亲的养护和护理纠缠时谨慎的谨慎的必要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号