首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Exercise Science >Physical Performance Assessments of Strength and Power in Women Collegiate Athletes
【24h】

Physical Performance Assessments of Strength and Power in Women Collegiate Athletes

机译:女院校运动员力量与力量的体能评估

获取原文
       

摘要

International Journal of Exercise Science 14(6): 984-993, 2021. Limited research exists on physical performance assessments for women collegiate athletes. The current cross-sectional study compared field-based tests of muscular strength and power and investigated their relationship. Sports included field hockey, volleyball, soccer, and softball. Tests of one repetition maximum (1-RM) back squat, 1-RM bench press, vertical jump, and standing long jump were administered. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) assessed differences across sports. Bivariate Pearson correlation coefficients examined relationships among tests. It was hypothesized sports with a higher anaerobic nature (volleyball, softball) would outperform those with higher aerobic nature (field hockey, soccer). Softball had the highest 1-RM bench press and 1-RM back squat (p 0.001) compared to field hockey, volleyball, and soccer. Further, softball had the highest vertical jump (p 0.001) compared to field hockey and soccer, but did not differ from volleyball. There were no differences across sports for standing long jump. Correlations (p 0.001) existed between 1-RM back squat and 1-RM bench press (n = 663, r = 0.56), and vertical jump and standing long jump (n = 160, r = 0.64). Results demonstrate strength and power differences among collegiate women’s sports. Softball consistently outperformed others in bench press, back squat, and vertical jump, which may be due to the demand of power embedded in the nature of the sport. These data provide descriptive measures of physical performance assessments and may assist practitioners with goal setting and program design.
机译:国际运动科学杂志14(6):984-993,2021。有限研究存在于女性大学运动员的身体绩效评估。目前的横截面研究比较了基于现场的肌肉力量和力量的测试,并研究了它们的关系。体育包括曲棍球,排球,足球和垒球。一次重复的测试最大(1-RM)后蹲,1 rm卧式压,垂直跳转,延长跳跃。方差单向分析(ANOVA)评估运动差异。 Bivariate Pearson相关系数检查了测试之间的关系。它是假设的运动,具有更高的厌氧性质(排球,垒球)会超越有氧性质更高的人(现场曲棍球,足球)。与现场曲棍球,排球和足球相比,垒球最高的1-RM台压净压和1 rm后蹲(p& 0.001)。此外,与现场曲棍球和足球相比,垒球具有最高的垂直跳跃(P <0.001),但与排球没有不同。跨越跳跃的运动没有差异。相关(P <0.001)存在于1-RM后蹲和1-RM台面(n = 663,r = 0.56)之间,垂直跳转和长跳跃(n = 160,r = 0.64)。结果展示了大学女性运动中的力量和权力差异。垒球始终如一地在长凳上,后蹲和垂直跳跃中表现出其他人,这可能是由于嵌入了这项运动本质上的力量。这些数据提供了物理性能评估的描述性措施,可以帮助具有目标设定和程序设计的从业者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号