首页> 外文期刊>Animal Studies Journal >The Covid Pandemic, ‘Pivotal’ Moments, and Persistent Anthropocentrism: Interrogating the (Il)legitimacy of Critical Animal Perspectives
【24h】

The Covid Pandemic, ‘Pivotal’ Moments, and Persistent Anthropocentrism: Interrogating the (Il)legitimacy of Critical Animal Perspectives

机译:covid大流行,“关键”时刻和持续的人类监测:询问批判性动物观点的(IL)合法性

获取原文
       

摘要

Situated alongside, and intertwined with, climate change and the relentless destruction of ‘wild’ nature, the global Covid-19 pandemic should have instigated serious reflection on our profligate use and careless treatment of other animals. Widespread references to ‘pivotal moments’ and the need for a reset in human relations with ‘nature’ appeared promising. However, important questions surrounding the pandemic’s origins and its wider context continue to be ignored and, as a result, this moment has proved anything but pivotal for animals. To explore this disconnect, this paper undertakes an analysis of dominant Covid discourses across key knowledge sites comprising mainstream media, major organizations, academia, and including prominent animal advocacy organizations. Drawing on the core tenets of Critical Animal Studies, the concept of critical animal perspectives is advanced as a way to assess these discourses and explore the illegitimacy of alternative ways of thinking about animals. Broadly, it is found that dominant Covid discourses fail to engage with the mechanisms by which human uses of nature and other animals are justified – specifically binary thinking, the normalization and naturalization of hierarchical categories of use, and the commodification of their lives and bodies – or to specify the nature and scope of practices that need to change. These key sites of knowledge, and also prominent advocacy organizations, thus reflect the illegitimacy of critical animal perspectives while also contributing to their ongoing delegitimation. Exacerbating this situation is the illegitimacy of the animal advocacy movement itself, which is attributed in part to movement factionalism and a diversity of poorly articulated aims. Mainstreaming and normalizing critical perspectives on animals has never been more necessary. Extended beyond academia, critical animal perspectives offer a potentially productive and practical way of approaching this endeavour so that future moments may be truly pivotal for humans and nonhumans alike.
机译:与旁边,与气候变化和无情地破坏“狂野”自然,全球Covid-19大流行,应该对我们的突出利用和对其他动物的粗心治疗进行严重思考。普遍参考“关键时刻”和与“自然”的人际关系重置的需求出现了。然而,围绕大流行的起源及其更广泛的背景的重要问题继续被忽略,因此,这一刻已经证明了动物的任何关键。为了探索这种脱节,本文对跨关键知识网站进行了分析,跨关键知识网站,包括主流媒体,主要组织,学术界,包括突出的动物倡导组织。绘制关键动物研究的核心原则,批判性动物观点的概念是评估这些讨论的方式,探索思考动物的违法方式的宗旨。广泛地,发现占主导地位的Covid Discours无法与自然和其他动物的人类用途合理的机制 - 特别是二进制思维,使用分层类别的标准化和归化,以及他们的生活和身体的商品 - 或指定需要改变的实践的性质和范围。这些知识的主要网站,以及突出的宣传组织,从而反映了批判性动物观点的非法性,同时也有助于他们正在进行的德格理。加剧这种情况是动物倡导运动本身的非法性,这部分归因于流动派系主义和多样性的令人不良的目标。主流化和正常化动物的批判性观点从未如此必要。超越学术界,关键的动物观点提供了一种潜在的富有成效和实用的方法,即致力于这一努力,以便将来的时刻对于人类和非人类而真正关键。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号