首页> 外文期刊>BJS Open >Video-assisted anal fistula treatment versus fistulectomy and sphincter repair in the treatment of high cryptoglandular anal fistula: a randomized clinical study
【24h】

Video-assisted anal fistula treatment versus fistulectomy and sphincter repair in the treatment of high cryptoglandular anal fistula: a randomized clinical study

机译:视频辅助肛瘘治疗与施瘘和括约肌修复治疗高密加密肛瘘:随机临床研究

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND:Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) may have a recurrence rate comparable to that of fistulectomy and sphincter repair (FSR) in the treatment of high anal fistula and with potential advantages in wound healing, functional outcome and quality of life. The aim and objectives of the study are to compare the outcome of VAAFT with that of FSR for high cryptoglandular anal fistula.METHODS:This was a single-centre randomized controlled trial of adults with high anal fistula comparing FSR with VAAFT. Primary outcome was fistula recurrence. Secondary outcomes were results of anal manometry, quality of life and faecal continence. A power calculation of 33 patients in each arm (1 : 1) was based on recurrence in the FSR and VAAFT groups of 5 per cent and 30 per cent respectively. Follow-up at 6 months after surgery included physical examination, MRI, anal manometry, quality-of-life assessment (RAND SF 36 questionnaire) and faecal-continence assessment (Wexner score).RESULTS:The study was terminated early due to high recurrence rates in both groups. A total of 45 patients were included. Recurrence rates were 65 per cent for VAAFT and 27 per cent for FSR, with hazard ratio 4.18 (P = 0.016). Length of the fistula was a risk factor with an association with recurrence (hazard ratio 1.8, P = 0.020). There were significant differences in quality of life in favour of FSR and in anal manometry in favour of VAAFT with a significant improvement in Wexner score in both groups.CONCLUSION:FSR was associated with a lower recurrence rate than VAAFT in the management of complex anal fistulae in this single-centre study but the study was terminated early due to higher than predicted recurrence rate in both groups.REGISTRATION NUMBER:NCT02585167 (http://www.clinicaltrials.org).? The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd.
机译:背景:视频辅助肛瘘治疗(VAAFT)可具有与瘘管切除术和括约肌修复(FSR)的复发率相当,治疗高肛肛瘘以及伤口愈合,功能结果和生活质量的潜在优势。该研究的目的和目标是将VAAFT的结果与高密封肛门瘘的FSR的结果进行比较。方法:这是一个单中心的大型随机对照试验,具有高肛门瘘与vaaft的FSR比较FSR。主要结果是瘘管复发。二次结果是肛门测压,生活质量和粪便胁迫的结果。每只臂33例(1:1)的功率计算基于FSR和VAAft组的复发分别为5%和30%。手术后6个月的随访包括体育检查,MRI,肛门测量,寿命质量评估(兰德SF 36问卷)和粪便 - 陆洲评估(WEXNER评分)。结果:该研究提前终止了由于高复发两组的利率。共有45名患者。 VAAFT的复发率为65%,FSR为27%,危险比为4.18(P = 0.016)。瘘管的长度是具有复发关联的危险因素(危险比1.8,p = 0.020)。有利于FSR和肛门测量的生命质量存在显着差异,并且在两组中对VAAFT进行了显着改善的影响。结论:FSR与复杂肛门瘘管管理中的复发率较低。在这个单一的学习中,但是由于在两组中的预测复发率高于预测的复发率,研究终止了。重复编号:NCT02585167(http://www.clinicaltrials.org)。作者2021年。由牛津大学出版社代表BJS社会有限公司出版

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号