...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >A three-armed randomised controlled trial investigating the comparative impact of guidance on the efficacy of a web-based stress management intervention and health impairing and promoting mechanisms of prevention
【24h】

A three-armed randomised controlled trial investigating the comparative impact of guidance on the efficacy of a web-based stress management intervention and health impairing and promoting mechanisms of prevention

机译:三武装随机对照试验调查指导对基于网络的压力管理干预和健康损害效力和促进预防机制的比较影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Web-based stress management interventions (SMI) fit increasingly digital lifestyles, reduce barriers of uptake and are easily scalable. SMIs might lower levels of stress in employees and thereby contribute to the prevention of depressive symptomatology. Different guidance formats can impact the efficacy of SMIs, with higher intensity assumed to result in larger effects. However, head-to-head comparisons of guidance formats are rare. This is the first trial to examine the impact of adherence-focused guidance compared to self-help on the efficacy of an occupational SMI compared to a wait list control condition. Additionally, it will be investigated if the SMI enfolds its impact on preventing depressive symptomatology by different pathways through reducing health impairing and increasing promoting factors. A three-armed randomised controlled trial (RCT) on an occupational SMI was conducted. 404 employees with elevated levels of perceived stress (PSS-10?≥?22) were randomly assigned to: adherence-focused guidance (AFG), self-help (SH) or a wait list control group (WLC). The primary outcome was perceived stress (PSS-10). Secondary outcomes included health- and work-related measures. A parallel mediation analysis with stress and resilience as mediators for the effect on depression (CES-D) was carried out. Data collection took place at baseline (T1), after 7?weeks (T2) and 6?months (T3). The SMI was effective for all groups on the primary and secondary outcomes. For stress, analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) revealed significant group effects at T2 (F2,400?=?36.08, P??.001) and T3 (F2,400?=?37.04, P??.001) with large effect sizes for AFG (T2: d?=?0.83; T3: d?=?0.85) and SH (T2: d?=?0.88; T3: d?=?0.91) compared to WLC. No significant group differences were found for the efficacy between AFG and SH on the outcomes. Adherence in terms of completed modules was significantly higher for AFG compared to SH. The SMI’s impact on depression was mediated by perceived stress: a1b1?=???0.77, 95% CI [??1.26, ??0.34] and resilience: a2b2?=???0.62, 95% CI [??1.05, ??0.26]. The SMI was effective for reducing stress and improving other health- and work-related outcomes, irrespective of the guidance format. Results did not demonstrate superiority of adherence-focused guidance for the efficacy but for adherence in terms of completed modules. Among other reasons, better communication strategies about offered guidance and awareness-raising measures are discussed. Results from mediation analysis suggest that preventive SMIs should be designed to reach two goals: reducing the risk factor of stress and simultaneously increasing health promoting factors such as resilience. German Clinical Trial Registration (DRKS) DRKS00005687 , 6/6/2014.
机译:基于网络的压力管理干预(SMI)适合越来越多的数字生活方式,降低摄取的障碍,并且很容易可扩展。 SMIS可能会降低员工的压力水平,从而有助于预防抑郁症状学。不同的引导格式可能会影响SMI的功效,具有更高的强度,以导致较大的效果。然而,指导格式的头部比较罕见。这是第一次检查遵守依从性指导的影响,与自助与等待名单控制条件相比职业SMI的疗效相比。另外,如果SMI通过降低健康损害和增加促进因子,SMI对预防不同途径的影响,将研究其对预防不同途径的影响。进行了职业SMI的三武装随机对照试验(RCT)。随机分配了404名具有升高的感知压力(PSS-10?≥?22)的员工:遵守侧视指导(AFG),自助(SH)或等待列表控制组(WLC)。主要结果是感知压力(PSS-10)。二次结果包括健康和与工作有关的措施。进行了强调和弹性作为对抑郁症(CES-D)的介质进行压力和弹性的平行调解分析。数据收集在7?周(T2)和6个月(T3)之后在基线(T1)进行。 SMI对主要和二次结果的所有群体有效。对于应力,协方差(ANCOVA)的分析显示在T2(F2,400?= 36.08,P≤001)和T3(F2,400≤001)和T3(F2,400?= 37.04,P≤00.001 )与WLC相比,具有大量效果尺寸(T2:D?= 0.83; T3:D?= 0.85)和SH(t2:d?= 0.88; t3:d?= 0.91)。没有发现痤疮和SH之间的疗效没有显着的群体差异。与SH相比,AFG的完成模块方面的遵守显着高。 SMI对抑郁的影响是通过感知的应力介导的:A1B1?= ??? 0.77,95%CI [?? 1.26,?? 0.34]和弹性:A2B2 ??? 0.62,95%CI [?? 1.05, ?? 0.26]。无论指导格式如何,SMI都有效地减少压力和改善其他健康和工作相关的结果。结果并未表现出依从性的效力指导的优越性,但在完成的模块方面遵守。除其他原因之外,还讨论了有关提供指导和提高认识措施的更好的沟通策略。调解分析的结果表明,应旨在达到两个目标:减少压力的危险因素,同时增加健康促进因素,如弹性。德国临床试验登记(DRKS)DRKS00005687,6/6/2014。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号