...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Arthroplasty >Preoperative Comorbidities and Postoperative Complications Do Not Influence Patient-Reported Satisfaction Following Humeral Head Resurfacing: Mid- to Long-term Follow-up of 106 Patients
【24h】

Preoperative Comorbidities and Postoperative Complications Do Not Influence Patient-Reported Satisfaction Following Humeral Head Resurfacing: Mid- to Long-term Follow-up of 106 Patients

机译:术前的合并症和术后并发症不会影响肱骨头重新铺设后的患者报告的满意度:106名患者的长期随访

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Humeral head resurfacing (HHR) has emerged as an alternative treatment for glenohumeral osteoarthritis. We investigated the outcomes of HHR using validated patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on 213 patients who underwent HHR. A PRO follow-up was performed by administering a questionnaire including the American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) score, Brophy activity survey, short form of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (quickDASH) survey, and general shoulder function. PRO scores were stratified by comorbidities and complications. Results: Survey responses were received from 106 patients (51%), with a mean follow-up of 5.6  1.8 years (range: 9 months to 6.1 years). Preoperative comorbidities were associated with significantly higher quickDASH scores. Postoperative complications were associated with significantly higher rates of current pain, higher visual analog scale scores, night pain, lower subjective shoulder values, and lower ASES pain and total scores. No differences in patient satisfaction were identified between the cohorts with and without preoperative comorbidities and between the cohorts with and without postoperative complications. Conclusion: In our cross-sectional analysis of mid- to long-term outcomes following HHR, preoperative comorbidities, or postoperative complications had no impact on patient-perceived postoperative satisfaction or most PROs. HHR is clinically viable in a wide variety of patients. Future work is necessary to compare the efficacy of HHR compared with more traditional total shoulder arthroplasty and stemmed hemiarthroplasty regarding long-term outcomes and appropriate indications.
机译:背景:肱骨头重新铺设(HHR)已成为Glenohumeral骨关节炎的替代治疗方法。我们使用经过验证的患者报告的结果(Pro)措施调查了HHR的结果。方法:对213名接受HHR的患者进行了回顾性审查。通过管理在包括美国肩部和肘部社会(ASES)得分,冰砍活动调查,手臂,肩膀和手(QuickDash)调查和一般肩部功能的疾病的疾病活动调查。 Pro分数通过合并和并发症分层。结果:从106名患者(51%)收到调查响应,平均随访5.6 1.8岁(范围:9个月至6.1岁)。术前共聚物与显着更高的竹镖分数相关。术后并发症与当前疼痛的显着提高,视觉模拟规模分数,夜间疼痛,较低的主观肩部值和较低的疼痛和总分数有关。在与术前合并症的群体和​​没有术后并发症的群组之间,在群组之间没有鉴定患者满意度的差异。结论:在HHR,术前共聚物或术后并发症后对长期长期结果的横截面分析,对患者感知的术后满意度或大多数利弊产生了影响。 HHR在各种患者中临床上可行。将来的工作是必要的,以比较HHR的疗效与更传统的总肩部关节成形术和茎的半啮形成术相比,关于长期结果和适当的适应症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号