首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Patient Experience >Ophthalmology Provider Ratings and Patient, Disease, and Appointment Factors
【24h】

Ophthalmology Provider Ratings and Patient, Disease, and Appointment Factors

机译:眼科提供者评级和患者,疾病和预约因素

获取原文
       

摘要

The purpose of the current study is to examine how nonmodifiable sociodemographic, disease, appointment, management, and survey factors correlate with provider rating. This was a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted on 29 857 patient Clinician and Group Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems surveys collected from January 2017 to January 2019 at a tertiary eye center. We included surveys of patients aged 18 years or older, who answered at least 4 of 6 subfield questions, and completed the survey within 90 days of the appointment. The main outcome was the odds of receiving top box score (TBS) of 10/10 on the survey question regarding overall provider rating. The results showed that the variables with higher odds of TBS included higher overall appointment attendance (odds ratio [OR]: 2.66 [95% CI: 1.23-5.75], P ? .013); older patient age (OR 2.44 [95% CI: 2.08-2.87], P .001]; higher percentage of survey questions completed (OR: 2.02 [95% CI: 1.79-2.27], P .001); better best corrected visual acuity (OR: 1.85 [95% CI: 1.3-2.64], P ? .001); optometry clinic visit (OR: 1.25 [95% CI: 1.15-1.36], P .001); having procedures (OR: 1.19 [95% CI: 1.04-1.36], P ? .013), surgery scheduled (OR: 1.18 [95% CI: 1.03-1.36], P ? .020], or refraction done (OR: 1.16 [95% CI: 1.08-1.25], P .001); being seen by male providers (OR: 1.11 [95% CI: 1.04-1.17], P ? .001); and having additional eye testing performed (OR: 1.06 [95% CI: 1.00-1.13], P ? .048). Variables associated with lower odds of TBS included longer time to complete survey (OR: 0.42 [95% CI: 0.3-0.58], P ? .001); new patient encounter (OR: 0.62 [95% CI: 0.58-0.65], P .001); and glaucoma (OR: 0.66 [95% CI: 0.59-0.75], P .001), cornea (OR: 0.79 [95% CI: 0.71-0.87], P .001), or comprehensive clinic visits (OR: 0.86 [95% CI: 0.79-0.94], P .001). Thus, nonmodifiable factors may affect the provider rating, and these factors should be studied further and accounted for when interpreting the results of patient experience surveys.
机译:目前研究的目的是审查如何与提供商评级相关的不可替代的社会渗透,疾病,预约,管理和调查因素。这是在2017年1月至2019年1月至2019年1月的第29次患者临床医生和群体消费者评估的回顾性横断面研究。我们包括18岁或以上的患者的调查,他们至少回答了6个小区问题中的至少4个,并在预约的90天内完成了调查。主要结果是在关于整体提供商评级的调查问题上获得10/10的最高框得分(TBS)的几率。结果表明,具有较高TBS的变量包括更高的总预约出席(差距[或]:2.66 [95%CI:1.23-5.75],P?.013);较旧的患者年龄(或2.44 [95%CI:2.08-2.87],P& .001];完成的调查问题的百分比较高(或:2.02 [95%CI:1.79-2.27],P& .001);更好的最佳矫正视力(或:1.85 [95%CI:1.3-2.64],P?.001);验光诊所访问(或:1.25 [95%CI:1.15-1.36],P <.001);拥有程序(或:1.19 [95%ci:1.04-1.36],p?.013),调度手术(或:1.18 [95%ci:1.03-1.36],p?.020]或完成折射(或:1.16 [95%ci:1.08-1.25],p& .001);由男性提供者(或:1.11 [95%CI:1.04-1.17],p?.001);并进行额外的眼睛测试(或:1.06 [95%CI:1.00-1.13],p?.048)。与TBS少量少量的变量包括较长的时间来完成调查(或:0.42 [95%CI:0.3-0.58],p?.001) ;新患者遇到(或:0.62 [95%CI:0.58-0.65],P& .001);和青光眼(或:0.66 [95%CI:0.59-0.75],P <.001),角膜(或者:0.79 [95%CI:0.71-0.87],P& .001)或全面的诊所访问(或:0.86 [95%CI:0.79-0]。 94],p& .001)。因此,不可替代的因素可能影响提供者评级,并且在解释患者体验调查结果时,应进一步研究这些因素并考虑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号