首页> 外文期刊>Therapeutic advances in drug safety. >Anticholinergic burden measures and older people’s falls risk: a systematic prognostic review
【24h】

Anticholinergic burden measures and older people’s falls risk: a systematic prognostic review

机译:抗胆碱能负荷措施和老年人的跌倒风险:系统性预测综述

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Introduction: Several adverse outcomes have been associated with anticholinergic burden (ACB), and these risks increase with age. Several approaches to measuring this burden are available but, to date, no comparison of their prognostic abilities has been conducted. This PROSPERO-registered systematic review (CRD42019115918) compared the evidence behind ACB measures in relation to their ability to predict risk of falling in older people. Methods: Medline (OVID), EMBASE (OVID), CINAHL (EMBSCO) and PsycINFO (OVID) were searched using comprehensive search terms and a validated search filter for prognostic studies. Inclusion criteria included: participants aged 65?years and older, use of one or more ACB measure(s) as a prognostic factor, cohort or case-control in design, and reporting falls as an outcome. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. Results: Eight studies reporting temporal associations between ACB and falls were included. All studies were rated high risk of bias in ?1 QUIPS tool categories, with five rated high risk ?3 categories. All studies (274,647 participants) showed some degree of association between anticholinergic score and increased risk of falls. Findings were most significant with moderate to high levels of ACB. Most studies (6/8) utilised the anticholinergic cognitive burden scale. No studies directly compared two or more ACB measures and there was variation in how falls were measured for analysis. Conclusion: The evidence supports an association between moderate to high ACB and risk of falling in older people, but no conclusion can be made regarding which ACB scale offers best prognostic value in older people. Plain language summary A review of published studies to explore which anticholinergic burden scale is best at predicting the risk of falls in older people Introduction: One third of older people will experience a fall. Falls have many consequences including fractures, a loss of independence and being unable to enjoy life. Many things can increase the chances of having a fall. This includes some medications. One type of medication, known as anticholinergic medication, may increase the risk of falls. These medications are used to treat common health issues including depression and bladder problems. Anticholinergic burden is the term used to describe the total effects from taking these medications. Some people may use more than one of these medications. This would increase their anticholinergic burden. It is possible that reducing the use of these medications could reduce the risk of falls. We need to carry out studies to see if this is possible. To do this, we need to be able to measure anticholinergic burden. There are several scales available, but we do not know which is best. Methods: We wanted to answer: ‘Which anticholinergic scale is best at predicting the risk of falling in older people?’. We reviewed studies that could answer this. We did this in a systematic way to capture all published studies. We restricted the search in several ways. We only included studies relevant to our question. Results: We found eight studies. We learned that people who are moderate to high users of these medications (often people who will use more than one of these medications) had a higher risk of falling. It was less clear if people who have a lower burden (often people who only use one of these medications) had an increased risk of falling. The low number of studies prevented us from determining if one scale was better than another. Conclusion: These findings suggest that we should reduce use of these medications. This could reduce the number falls and improve the well-being of older people.
机译:介绍:几种不良结果与抗胆碱能负担(ACB)有关,这些风险随着年龄的增长而增加。迄今为止,有几种衡量这种负担的方法可以进行预后能力的比较。这种繁荣注册的系统评价(CRD42019115918)将ACB措施的证据与他们预测落在老年人坠落的能力相比。方法:使用全面的搜索条件和验证的搜索过滤器搜索Medline(Ovid),Embase(Ovid),Cinahl(embsco)和Psycinfo(Ovid)以进行预后研究。包含标准包括:参与者年龄65岁以下,年龄较大,使用一个或多个ACB措施作为预后因素,群组或案例控制设计,并报告作为结果。使用预后研究(Quips)工具的质量评估偏差风险。结果:八项研究报告了ACB与跌倒之间的时间关联。所有研究都被评为偏差的高风险?1个QUIPS工具类别,五个额定高风险?3个类别。所有研究(274,647名参与者)在抗胆碱能评分和跌倒风险增加之间表现出一定程度的关联。调查结果最显着,中度至高水平的ACB。大多数研究(6/8)利用抗胆碱能认知负荷量表。没有学习比较两种或更多的ACB措施,并且如何测量分析的跌落程度。结论:证据支持中度至高痤疮之间的关联和落在老年人的风险之间,但没有结论,可以在老年人中提供最佳预后价值。简单语言摘要审查发表的研究,以探索哪种抗胆碱能负荷量表最适合预测老年人跌倒的风险引言:三分之一的老年人将陷入困境。瀑布有许多包括骨折,独立丧失和无法享受生活的后果。许多事情可以增加跌倒的机会。这包括一些药物。一种类型的药物,称为抗胆碱能药物,可能会增加瀑布的风险。这些药物用于治疗常见的健康问题,包括抑郁和膀胱问题。抗胆碱能负担是用于描述从服用这些药物的总效果的术语。有些人可以使用不止一种这些药物。这会增加他们的抗胆碱能负担。减少这些药物的使用可能会降低落下的风险。我们需要进行研究,以了解是否有可能。为此,我们需要能够测量抗胆碱能负担。有几种尺度可用,但我们不知道哪个是最好的。方法:我们想回答:'哪种抗胆碱能量表最适合预测落在老年人的风险?“我们审查了可以回答这个问题的研究。我们以系统的方式做到了捕获所有公布的研究。我们以几种方式限制了搜索。我们只包括与我们的问题有关的研究。结果:我们发现了八项研究。我们了解到,那些中等至这些药物的高级用户的人(通常使用超过其中一种药物的人)的堕落风险较高。如果有较低的负担的人(通常只使用其中一种药物的人)的人的风险增加,那就不太清楚。较低的研究有阻止我们确定一个比例是否优于另一个规模。结论:这些研究结果表明,我们应该减少这些药物的使用。这可以减少数量下降并改善老年人的福祉。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号