...
首页> 外文期刊>Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology. >Effectiveness of 2-year treatment with aripiprazole long-acting injectable and comparison with paliperidone palmitate
【24h】

Effectiveness of 2-year treatment with aripiprazole long-acting injectable and comparison with paliperidone palmitate

机译:2年治疗与阿里希哌唑的效果长效可注射和与帕帕里酮棕榈酸盐的比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: The pragmatic management of psychotic disorders is more complex than that delivered in a controlled trial environment. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of aripiprazole long-acting injectable (ALAI) and compare it with another commonly used long-acting anti-psychotic, once-monthly paliperidone palmitate (PP1M). Methods: This naturalistic, independent 4-year mirror image study compared the mean number and length of hospital admissions 2?years before and 2?years after treatment initiation with ALAI. Retention rates, discontinuation reasons and level of adherence were also recorded. Furthermore, indirect comparisons were made between treatment outcomes on ALAI and PP1M. Results: A total of 109 eligible patients with a severe mental illness (65% with schizophrenia and 35% with other diagnosis) commenced on ALAI and 173 patients (69% with schizophrenia and 31% with other diagnoses) initiated on PP1M were included. Of these, 37% on ALAI and 34% on PP1M stopped treatment at 2?years; retention rates were most favourable for the schizophrenia group on PP1M. Patients were more likely to discontinue due to lack of effectiveness on ALAI and due to tolerability issues on PP1M. Those who continued for 2?years on ALAI ( n?=?69), demonstrated an overall decrease of 84% in the mean number and 88% in the mean length of hospital admissions compared with the 2?years before initiation. Although patients on ALAI appeared to have a significantly higher bed occupancy the 2-year period before initiation than patients on PP1M, the reductions in hospitalizations were comparable across both cohorts after 2?years of treatment. Conclusions: The introduction of ALAI had a substantial impact on long-term clinical outcomes in this naturalistic cohort; more than half of patients continued treatment and had no admission during 2?years of follow up. There were no significant differences in hospitalisation rates between patients on ALAI and PP1M at 2?years.
机译:背景:精神病疾病的务实管理比受控试验环境中交付的更复杂。因此,本研究旨在评估Aripiprazole长效注射(ALAI)的真实效果,并将其与另一个常用的长效抗精神病,一次每月帕帕里酮棕榈酸酯(PP1M)进行比较。方法:这种自然主义,独立的4年镜像研究比较了医院入院的平均数和长度2?年前和2年的治疗后的治疗开始。还记录了保留率,中止原因和依从性水平。此外,在ALAI和PP1M的治疗结果之间进行间接比较。结果:在Alai和173名患者中,共有109名具有严重精神疾病的符合条件的精神疾病(Schizophercia和35%),并在PP1M上启动了173名患者(69%的精神分裂症和31%)。其中,37%的Alai和34%的PP1M停止治疗2年;年份;保留率最有利于PP1M上的精神分裂症组。由于Alai缺乏有效性,并且由于PP1M的耐受性问题,患者更有可能停止。那些持续2年的人在Alai(n?=?69)上,在平均数中展示了84%的总体下降,而在发起前的2年内,医院入学的平均长度为88%。虽然Alai的患者似乎具有比PP1M的患者在发起前2年的床占患者,但在2年后的两个群组中,住院治疗的减少比较。结论:Alai的引入对这一自然队列的长期临床结果产生了重大影响;超过一半的患者继续治疗,在2年后没有入场。 Alai患者与2年的PP1M之间的住院费率没有显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号