首页> 外文期刊>SAGE Open >Writing “Eastness”: Romania and the Conundrum of Regionness in the Black Sea Area
【24h】

Writing “Eastness”: Romania and the Conundrum of Regionness in the Black Sea Area

机译:写作“东北”:罗马尼亚和黑海地区的地区难题

获取原文
           

摘要

The article sets out to explore how Romanian authorities have struggled to get rid of the border country syndrome through subregional initiatives in the Black Sea area once Romania joined the Euro-Atlantic community. The article examines how such subregional policies have performatively constituted Romania’s strategic identity in the area. Formally, all the subregional initiatives that the article addresses have drawn on an institutional logic of security. Informally, though, they promoted a geopolitical vision of security. Such a logic has sharply conflicted with the underlying security philosophy of both the European Union and other successful subregional initiatives in the area. Thus, instead of improving Romania’s level of regionness, these subregional policies have ended up creating more dividing lines in an already strained security environment. The article draws on David Campbell’s political criticism and shows how Romania’s security practices in the Black Sea area, instead of instilling Europeanness into the country’s strategic identity, have ended up reinforcing its “Eastness.”.
机译:文章宣布探索罗马尼亚当局如何通过罗马尼亚加入欧洲大西洋界,通过黑海地区的次区域举措摆脱边境国家综合征。本文探讨了这些次区域政策如何在该地区执行罗马尼亚的战略形式。正式的是,所有次区域倡议,这些举措是关于安全的制度逻辑所汲取的。但非正式地,他们促进了地缘政治愿景。这种逻辑对该地区的欧盟和其他成功的次区域举措的潜在安全哲学急剧冲突。因此,而不是提高罗马尼亚的地区,这些次区域政策最终在一个已经紧张的安全环境中创造了更多的分界线。本文借鉴了大卫坎贝尔的政治批评,展示了罗马尼亚在黑海地区的安全实践如何,而不是将欧洲灌输到国家的战略形式,最终加强了“东方”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号