...
首页> 外文期刊>Nefrologia >Sofosbuvir-based regimens for HCV in stage 4–stage 5 chronic kidney disease. A systematic review with meta-analysis
【24h】

Sofosbuvir-based regimens for HCV in stage 4–stage 5 chronic kidney disease. A systematic review with meta-analysis

机译:基于Sofosbuvir的HCV中的4-阶段5阶段慢性肾病中的中医方案。 与Meta分析进行系统审查

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundHepatitis C is an important agent of liver damage in patients with chronic kidney disease and the advent of DAAs has dramatically changed the management of HCV positive patients, including those with advanced CKD. Sofosbuvir is the backbone of many anti-HCV regimens based on DAAs but it remains unclear whether it is appropriate for HCV-infected patients with stage 4–5 CKD.Study aims and designWe performed a systematic review of the literature with a meta-analysis of clinical studies in order to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SOF-based DAA regimens in patients with stage 4–5 CKD. The primary outcome was sustained viral response (as a measure of efficacy); the secondary outcomes were the frequency of SAEs and drop-outs due to AEs (as measures of tolerability). The random-effects model of DerSimonian and Laird was adopted, with heterogeneity and stratified analyses.ResultsThirty clinical studies (n=1537 unique patients) were retrieved. The pooled SVR12 and SAEs rate was 0.99 (95% confidence intervals, 0.97; 1.0,I2=99.8%) and 0.09 (95% CI, 0.05; 0.13,I2=84.3%), respectively. The pooled SVR12 rate in studies with high HCV RNA levels at baseline was lower, 0.87 (95% CI, 0.75; 1.0,I2=73.3%) (P<0.001). The pooled drop-out rate due to AEs was 0.02 (95% CI, ?0.01; 0.04,I2=16.1%). Common serious adverse events were anemia (n=26, 38%) and reduced eGFR (n=14, 19%). SAEs were more common in studies adopting full-dose sofosbuvir (pooled rate of SAEs 0.15, 95% CI, 0.06; 0.25;I2=80.1%) and in those based on ribavirin (0.15, 95% CI, 0.07; 0.23,I2=95.8%). Six studies (n=69 patients) reported eGFR levels at baseline/post- antiviral therapy; no consistent changes were found.ConclusionsSOF-based regimens appear safe and effective in patients with stage 4–5 CKD. Serum creatinine should be carefully monitored during therapy with SOF in patients with CKD. Randomized controlled studies in order to expand our knowledge on this point are under way.
机译:BackgroundHeaditis C是慢性肾病患者肝损伤的重要因素,DAA的出现显着改变了HCV阳性患者的管理,包括高级CKD的患者。 Sofosbuvir是基于DAAS许多抗HCV方案的骨干,但它仍然尚不清楚它是否适用于HCV感染阶段4-5 CKD的患者.Sudy AIMS和DesignWe对文献进行了系统审查,具有Meta分析临床研究,以评价SOF为4-5 CKD患者中SOF的DAA方案的疗效和安全性。主要结果是持续的病毒反应(作为疗效的量度);二次结果是由于AES(作为可耐受性的衡量标准而导致的SAES和辍学频率。采用异质性和分层分析,采用了划分和莱德的随机效应模型。检测临床研究(N = 1537名独特的患者)。汇集的SVR12和SAES速率为0.99(95%置信区间,0.97; 1.0,I2 = 99.8%)和0.09(95%CI,0.05; 0.13,I2 = 84.3%)。基线高HCV RNA水平的研究中汇集的SVR12速率较低,0.87(95%CI,0.75; 1.0,I2 = 73.3%)(P <0.001)。由于AES引起的汇集辍学率为0.02(95%CI,?0.01; 0.04,I2 = 16.1%)。常见的严重不良事件是贫血(n = 26,38%),并减少EGFR(n = 14,19%)。在采用全剂量Sofosbuvir的研究中,SAES更常见(SAES 0.15,95%CI,0.06; 0.25; I2 = 80.1%)和基于利巴韦林的那些(0.15,95%CI,0.07; 0.23,I2 = 95.8%)。六项研究(n = 69名患者)报告基线/抗病毒治疗的EGFR水平;没有发现任何一致的变化。基于阶段4-5 CKD的患者,基于过程的方案显得安全有效。在CKD患者的治疗过程中应仔细监测血清肌酐。随机对照研究为了扩大我们对这一点的知识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号