首页> 外文期刊>British journal of clinical pharmacology >No association between use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers prior to hospital admission and clinical course of COVID-19 in the COvid MEdicaTion (COMET) study
【24h】

No association between use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers prior to hospital admission and clinical course of COVID-19 in the COvid MEdicaTion (COMET) study

机译:在Covid药物(Comet)研究中,使用血管紧张素转化酶抑制剂或血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂在医院 - 19的入院和临床过程中使用之间的关联

获取原文
           

摘要

Since the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2, also known as COVID-19, conflicting theories have circulated on the influence of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) on incidence and clinical course of COVID-19, but data are scarce. The COvid MEdicaTion (COMET) study is an observational, multinational study that focused on the clinical course of COVID-19 (i.e. hospital mortality and intensive care unit [ICU] admission), and included COVID-19 patients who were registered at the emergency department or admitted to clinical wards of 63 participating hospitals. Pharmacists, clinical pharmacologists or treating physicians collected data on medication prescribed prior to admission. The association between the medication and composite clinical endpoint, including mortality and ICU admission, was analysed by multivariable logistic regression models to adjust for potential confounders. A total of 4870 patients were enrolled. ACEi were used by 847 (17.4%) patients and ARB by 761 (15.6%) patients. No significant association was seen with ACEi and the composite endpoint (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79 to 1.12), mortality (OR 1.03; 95%CI 0.84 to 1.27) or ICU admission (OR 0.96; 95%CI 0.78 to 1.19) after adjustment for covariates. Similarly, no association was observed between ARB and the composite endpoint (OR 1.09; 95%CI 0.90 to 1.30), mortality (OR 1.12; OR 0.90 to 1.39) or ICU admission (OR 1.21; 95%CI 0.98 to 1.49). In conclusion, we found no evidence of a harmful or beneficial effect of ACEi or ARB use prior to hospital admission on ICU admission or hospital mortality.
机译:由于SARS-COV-2的爆发,也称为Covid-19,因此矛盾的理论循环血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)和血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ARB)对Covid-19的发病率和临床过程的影响,但数据很少。 Covid药物(Comet)研究是一个观察到的跨国研究,重点关注Covid-19的临床进程(即医院死亡率和重症监护单元[ICU]入学),并包括在急诊部门注册的Covid-19患者或录取63家参加医院的临床病房。药剂师,临床药理学家或治疗医师收集了在入院前规定的药物的数据。通过多变量的逻辑回归模型分析了药物和复合临床终点,包括死亡率和ICU入院的关联,以调整潜在的混凝剂。共有4870名患者注册。 847(17.4%)患者和ARB的ACEI用于761名(15.6%)患者使用。 ACEI和复合终点未观察到任何明显的关联(调节的差距[或] 0.94; 95%置信区间[CI] 0.79至1.12),死亡率(或1.03; 95%CI 0.84至1.27)或ICU入院(或0.96调整协变量后,95%CI 0.78至1.19)。类似地,在仲裁和复合终点(或1.09; 95%CI 0.90至1.30)之间没有观察到任何关联,死亡率(或1.12;或0.90至1.39)或ICU入院(或1.21; 95%CI 0.98至1.49)。总之,我们发现没有证据表明Acei或ARB在医院入院入院或医院死亡率之前使用的有害或有益效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号