...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders >Does meniscectomy have any advantage over conservative treatment in middle-aged patients with degenerative medial meniscus posterior root tear?
【24h】

Does meniscectomy have any advantage over conservative treatment in middle-aged patients with degenerative medial meniscus posterior root tear?

机译:Mensiccectomy是否对中年患者的保守治疗有任何优势,退化内侧弯月面后滴撕裂?

获取原文

摘要

The best treatment for degenerative medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic meniscectomy and conservative treatment for degenerative MMPRT. From January 2007 to December 2014, 146 patients (Meniscectomy group, 90; Conservative group, 56) were evaluated. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale, International Knee Documentation Committee subjective scoring scale, Tegner activity scale, and Lysholm knee scoring scale at the final follow-up. Radiologic outcomes evaluated the progression of osteoarthritis (OA) according to the Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) classification. We compared the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA), medial proximal tibial angle, tibial posterior slope angle, and width of medial joint space. After an average follow-up of 6.3?years, the survivorship was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method. All clinical outcomes were significantly improved in both groups after treatment, with no significant differences between the two groups at the final follow-up. The progression of OA according to the K-L classification, HKAA and width of medial joint space was significantly advanced in the meniscectomy group (p?=?0.03, 0.04, 0.03, respectively). The 10-year survival rates in the meniscectomy and conservative groups were 87 and 88%, respectively. This study demonstrated that both conservative treatment and meniscectomy provided symptomatic relief. However, it was confirmed that OA progression was more severe in the meniscectomy. We conclude that arthroscopic meniscectomy had no advantage over conservative treatment in terms of clinical outcomes and OA progression in middle-aged patients with MMPRT. Level III; retrospective comparative study.
机译:退行内侧弯月面后根撕裂(MMPRT)的最佳处理仍然存在争议。本研究旨在比较关节镜下垂术和保守治疗对退化MMPRT的临床和放射性结果。从2007年1月到2014年12月,评估了146名患者(Menadcentomy Group,90;保守群,56)。使用视觉模拟规模,国际膝关节委员会主观评分规模,TEGNER活动规模和Lysholm膝关节评分规模评估临床结果。放射学结果根据Kellgren-Lawrence(K-L)分类评估了骨关节炎(OA)的进展。我们比较了髋关节脚踝角(HKAA),内侧近端胫骨角,胫骨后坡角和内侧关节空间的宽度。平均随访6.3?年后,使用Kaplan-Meier方法分析生存。治疗后,两组均有显着改善的所有临床结果,两组在最终随访中没有显着差异。 MENISTOMECTOMY组的K-L分类,HKAA和内侧关节空间的HKAA和宽度的进展显着提出(P?= 0.03,0.04,0.03)。半月岩和保守群体的10年生存率分别为87%和88%。本研究表明,保守治疗和半月切除术提供症状性浮雕。然而,证实,OA进展在裂缝切除术中更严重。我们得出结论,关节镜末膜切除术在中年患者MMPRT中的临床结果和OA进展方面没有优势。第三级;回顾性比较研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号