首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >Impact on decision making framework for medicine purchasing in Chinese public hospital decision-making: determining the value of five dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors
【24h】

Impact on decision making framework for medicine purchasing in Chinese public hospital decision-making: determining the value of five dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors

机译:对中国公共医院决策中药品采购决策框架的影响:确定五二肽肽酶4(DPP-4)抑制剂的值

获取原文
           

摘要

Medicine purchasing in Chinese public hospitals is decided by the hospital Pharmacy Management Committee (PMC), that is complex, subjective and requires efficient approaches to ensure transparency and consistency for the factors being considered. This study aimed to use the Evidence and Value: Impact on Decision Making (EVIDEM) framework to assess medicine in these hospitals. In this study anti-diabetic drugs DPP-4 inhibitors, which work by inhibiting the activation of the Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, were appraised. Following EVIDEM methodology (EVIDEM-10th), we convened an appraisal group and asked each individual to express their perspectives by assigning weights to each criterion. A systematic literature search for information of each criterion of five DPP-4 inhibitors was completed. Then the appraisal group scored for each criterion of the five DPP-4 inhibitors. The estimated value of the five DPP-4 inhibitors was obtained by Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) which combined individual weighting of each criterion with individual scoring for each intervention in each criterion. By assigning weights, the most important criterion was the quality of evidence (4.01±0.52), and that the comparative cost consequences-non-medical cost was the least important criterion (2.87±1.03). Criteria included disease severity, size of the affected population, comparative effectiveness, type of therapeutic/preventive benefit and cost of intervention, all of which were assigned the same weight of 3.58. After MCDA, the overall value orders for each DPP-4 inhibitor included Sitagliptin (0.45), Linagliptin (0.44), Vildagliptin (0.43), Alogliptin (0.42) and Saxagliptin (0.40). Based on EVIDEM framework and MCDA, we found that overall value of five DPP-4 inhibitors was similar. It is feasible to use the EVIDEM framework and MCDA in purchasing medicine for Chinese public hospitals.
机译:中国公立医院的医学购买由医院药房管理委员会(PMC)决定,这是复杂的主观性的,并且需要有效的方法,以确保所考虑的因素的透明度和一致性。本研究旨在使用证据和价值:对决策制定(EVIDEM)框架的影响,以评估这些医院的药物。在该研究中,通过抑制二肽基肽酶4(DPP-4)抑制剂的活化,通过抑制抗糖尿病药物DPP-4抑制剂。在Evidem方法(Evidem-10)之后,我们召开了评估小组,并要求每个人通过将权重分配给每个标准来表达他们的观点。完成了5种DPP-4抑制剂的每个标准信息的系统文献。然后评估群体对五种DPP-4抑制剂的每个标准进行评分。通过多标准决策分析(MCDA)获得五种DPP-4抑制剂的估计值,该分析分析(MCDA)组合每个标准的各个标准的单独加权,每个介入每个标准中的每个介入都有个别得分。通过分配权重,最重要的标准是证据质量(4.01±0.52),并且比较成本后果 - 非医疗成本是最不重要的标准(2.87±1.03)。标准包括疾病严重程度,受影响人口的大小,对比有效性,治疗/预防效益的类型和干预成本,所有这些都被指定为3.58的重量。在MCDA之后,每个DPP-4抑制剂的总价值订单包括SITAGLIPTIN(0.45),LINAGLIPTIN(0.44),VIALAGLIPTIN(0.43),Alogliptin(0.42)和Saxagliptin(0.40)。基于Evidem Framework和MCDA,我们发现五个DPP-4抑制剂的总体值相似。使用Evidem Framework和MCDA为中国公立医院购买医学是可行的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号