...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >Effect of Teaching Intervention on Cancer Facts to Reduce Cancer Social Stigma in Rural Adults- A Pilot Study
【24h】

Effect of Teaching Intervention on Cancer Facts to Reduce Cancer Social Stigma in Rural Adults- A Pilot Study

机译:教学干预对癌症事实降低农村癌症社会耻辱的影响 - 试点研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Worldwide, cancer is the second major cause of death and is accountable for an approximately 9.6 million deaths in the year 2018. Cancer carries a stigma due to its link with death. This affects the health seeking behaviour of the cancer patients.Aim: To evaluate the effect of teaching intervention on cancer facts to reduce social stigma among rural adults.Materials and Methods: This quasi-experimental pretest post-test control group study was conducted from 5th January 2021 to 5th February 2021, in rural community. Hundred adults between 18-65 years of age were selected based on purposive sampling technique and randomly assigned to an experimental and control group. Data was collected using baseline proforma and self-designed cancer social stigma scale which is a 5-point rating scale, consisting of 20 statements. The total score of each participant was calculated and categorised as severe, moderate, mild and no social stigma. Individual teaching intervention was given on first day to the intervention group and post-test was conducted after seven days on both the groups. The data were analysed using the t-test and chi-square tests.Results: The total study population of 100 adults was divided into intervention group (mean age 33.34±4.46 years) and control group (mean age 36.22±4.07 years) of 50 subjects each. Before the teaching intervention, the mean and Standard Deviation (SD) of social stigma scores of intervention group and control group were 59.9±13.6 and 61.38±9.8, respectively. After the intervention, the score of the intervention group and control group were 30.62±4.5 and 61.44±10.8, respectively. Independent t-test showed that there was a significant difference in social stigma score between intervention group and control group after the intervention (p-value<0.05).Conclusion: Study findings revealed that teaching intervention on cancer fact is effective in reducing social stigma among general population. Since the prevalence of cancer is high, there is an immediate need to educate the rural population on prevention, myths and realities of cancer.
机译:全世界,癌症是第二次死亡原因,2018年的大约960万人负责。由于其死亡的联系,癌症承担耻辱。这影响了癌症患者的健康行为2021年1月至2021年2月5日,在农村社区。根据有目的采样技术选择18-65岁的成人,并随机分配到实验和对照组。使用基线形式和自行癌症社会耻辱量级收集数据,这是5点额定尺度,由20个陈述组成。每个参与者的总分计算并分类为严重,中等,轻度和没有社会耻辱。个人教学干预是在第一天给予干预组,在两组七天后进行后测试。使用T检验和Chi-Square Tests分析数据每个受试者。在教学干预之前,期干预组和对照组的社会耻辱评数的平均值和标准偏差分别为59.9±13.6和61.38±9.8。干预后,干预组和对照组的得分分别为30.62±4.5和61.44±10.8。独立的T检验表明,干预后干预组和对照组之间的社会耻辱评分有显着差异(p值<0.05)。结论:研究结果表明,对癌症事实的教学干预有效减少社会耻辱总人口。由于癌症的患病率很高,因此有必要教育农村人口,以预防,神话和癌症现实。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号