...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research >Bupivacaine versus Ropivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia in Femorosciatic Blocks in Lower Limb Surgeries- A Randomised Clinical Trial
【24h】

Bupivacaine versus Ropivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia in Femorosciatic Blocks in Lower Limb Surgeries- A Randomised Clinical Trial

机译:Bupivacaine与罗哌卡因术后患者在股阶段血管突段术后股骨突血段 - 随机临床试验

获取原文

摘要

Peripheral Nerve Blockade (PNB) is a well-accepted component of comprehensive anaesthetic care. Ropivacaine is a newer local long acting anaesthetic agent. Despite the extensive use and relative safety of bupivacaine, ropivacaine have been developed as alternative agent to decrease the risk for cardiac and nervous system.Aim: To compare safety, efficacy and duration of postoperative analgesia between bupivacaine and ropivacaine in femorosciatic blocks.Materials and Methods: This randomised- clinical study was conducted at HBT Medical College and Dr R.N.Cooper, Municipal General Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. Total of 78 patients scheduled to undergo elective knee and below knee orthopaedic surgeries under subarachnoid block were divided into two groups- Group A, patients received 25 mL of 0.25% injection bupivacaine for femoral nerve block and sciatic nerve block each and in Group B, patients received 25 mL of 0.25% Inj. ropivacaine for femoral nerve block and sciatic nerve block each. After giving femorosciatic block, Sub-Arachnoid Block (SAB) was given to all patients. The primary and secondary outcome variables were duration of analgesia and time of rescue analgesia, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, patient satisfaction score, surgeon satisfaction score, respectively. Continuous variables were analysed by unpaired t-test. The ordinal data is analysed using Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical data is analysed using chi-square test.Results: Demographic and haemodynamic parameters were statistically not significant. Time to the first rescue analgesia in group A was 718.2 minutes and in group B time was 652.1 minutes which is statistically significant (p-value=0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in VAS score at each time interval postoperatively. Both the drugs provided effective postoperative pain relief. All surgeons and patients were agreed with analgesia, as evidence by good patient satisfaction score. Mean Surgeon satisfaction score was 7 in each groups.Conclusion: Bupivacaine provides longer duration of postoperative analgesia than ropivacaine. Both bupivacaine and ropivacaine achieved comparable quality of analgesia. Ropivacaine being a more cardiostable drug can be effectively used as an alternative to bupivacaine for femorosciatic nerve block in several clinical situations.
机译:周围神经阻滞(PNB)是综合麻醉护理的良好成分。 Ropivacaine是一种较新的局部长效麻醉剂。尽管Bupivacaine的广泛使用和相对安全,Ropivacaine已成为替代药物,以降低心脏和神经系统的风险。事宜:比较Bupivacaine和Ropivacaine之间的术后镇痛的安全性,疗效和持续时间。材料和方法。材料和方法:这项随机临床研究是在HBT医学院进行的,并在印度Maharashtra孟买孟买博士,孟买博士。分为蛛网膜下腔块下的68名患者预定接受选修膝关节和低于膝关节骨科手术的患者,分为两组 - A组,患者每组股骨神经块和坐骨神经阻滞的患者25毫升0.25%注射武器卡卡,患者收到25毫升0.25%的注射。股骨神经块和坐骨神经阻滞的罗哌卡因。赋予股阶段似段后,给予所有患者的亚蛛网膜块(SAB)。初级和次要结果变量是镇痛和救援镇痛时间的持续时间,视觉模拟量表(VAS)得分,患者满意度评分,外科医生满意度得分。通过未配对的T检验分析连续变量。使用Mann-Whitney U测试分析序数数据。使用Chi-Square Test.results分析分类数据:人口统计学和血液动力学参数在统计上并不重要。 A组中第一个救援镇痛的时间为718.2分钟,B族时间为652.1分钟,其统计学意义(p值= 0.001)。术后每个时间间隔没有统计学上的差异。两种药物都提供了有效的术后疼痛缓解。所有外科医生和患者都与镇痛同意,作为良好患者满意度评分的证据。每组的平均外科医生满意度得分为7分。结论:Bupivacaine提供术后镇痛的持续时间而不是Ropivacaine。 Bupivacaine和Ropivacaine都达到了可比的镇痛质量。在几种临床情况下,Ropivacaine可以有效地用作雌性神经阻滞的Bupivacaine的替代品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号