...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of infectious diseases : >Comparison of an inactivated Covid19 vaccine-induced antibody response with concurrent natural Covid19 infection
【24h】

Comparison of an inactivated Covid19 vaccine-induced antibody response with concurrent natural Covid19 infection

机译:灭活Covid19疫苗诱导抗体反应与并发天然Covid19感染的比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objectives The risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2 is high among the health care workers (HCW). The comparison between the antibody response to an inactivated Covid19 vaccine and the antibodies that developed during Covid-19 infection has not been elucidated. In this study, vaccine-induced antibody levels were compared with the antibodies developed in naturally infected HCWs. Methods Eighty vaccinated individuals and 80 Covid-19 patients enrolled to the study. Both groups were matched on age, gender and antibody testing time. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 total Ig (Roche) and Anti-SARS-CoV-2 ELISA (IgG) (Euroimmun, Germany) were used to detect antibodies. Results The anti-S positivity were determined to be 96.2% and 92.5% in vaccinated and patient groups (p=0.303) while the anti-N positivity was 51.2% and 98.8%, respectively (p=0,0001). The median values for anti-S and anti-N antibodies were statistically significant between both groups. When the vaccinated group was compared with the severe and non-severe patient groups, statistically significant differences were found for both regarding anti-S1 and anti-N antibody titers (p=0,012, p=0,0001, respectively). For the patient group, there was a positive correlation between the age and anti-S1 antibody titers (r=0.333; p=0.003) and there was also a statistically significant increase in anti-N antibody titers in time (r=0.505; p=0.0001). Conclusion The anti-S seroconversion ratio in vaccinated individuals were higher than what was reported by the vaccine manufacturer. The antibody titers in the vaccinated group were lower than the patients group. The decrease in anti-S1 antibody titers in time were considered to be a disadvantage and an undesired phenomenon.
机译:目标在医疗工作者(HCW)中,合约SARS-COV-2的风险很高。对灭活的Covid19疫苗的抗体反应的比较并未阐明在Covid-19感染期间产生的抗体。在该研究中,将疫苗诱导的抗体水平与在天然感染的HCW中产生的抗体进行比较。方法八十次接种疫苗的个体和80例Covid-19患者注册研究。两组对年龄,性别和抗体测试时间匹配。抗SARS-COV-2总Ig(Roche)和抗SARS-COV-2 ELISA(IgG)(Euroimmun,德国)用于检测抗体。结果抗-S阳性测定为疫苗和患者基团的96.2%和92.5%(p = 0.303),而抗N阳性分别为51.2%和98.8%(p = 0,0001)。两组之间的抗-S和抗N抗体的中值均有统计学意义。当与严重和非严重患者组进行疫苗基团时,关于抗S1和抗N抗体滴度(P = 0.012,P = 0,0001),发现统计学上显着的差异。对于患者组,年龄和抗S1抗体滴度(R = 0.333; P = 0.003)之间存在阳性相关性,并且还存在统计上显着的抗N抗体滴度(R = 0.505; p = 0.0001)。结论疫苗接种个体中的抗S血清转化比高于疫苗制造商报道的血清转化比。疫苗接种组中的抗体滴度低于患者组。抗S1抗体滴度及时的降低被认为是一种缺点和不期望的现象。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号