...
首页> 外文期刊>IFAC PapersOnLine >Gaussian Process Modelling of the F-16 Ground Vibration Test Benchmark: Data Selection Case Study ?
【24h】

Gaussian Process Modelling of the F-16 Ground Vibration Test Benchmark: Data Selection Case Study ?

机译:高斯工艺建模的F-16地面振动测试基准:数据选择案例研究

获取原文

摘要

We observe the effects of training data sample selection in modelling of a physical system with Gaussian process nonlinear autoregressive models with exogenous input. Gaussian process modelling limits the number of training data points and we use a big nonlinear benchmark data set. The combination calls for training data sample selection. We compare a ‘smart’ method based on Euclidean distance between training data points with decimation. We use the training data samples obtained by both methods to train the models, test model predictions on a test data set, and calculate two figures of merit, eRMSt and mean standardised log loss (MSLL). The model trained on the ‘smartly’ selected training data points is better in eRMSt while the one with the decimated data is superior in MSLL. The direct conclusion is that the purpose of the model determines which training data sample selection method is better, as the relevant figure of merit depends on the model purpose. We notice that the predicted variance is more sensitive to the training data sample than the predicted mean. We warn that training data sample selection may have unexpected consequences.
机译:我们遵守培训数据采样选择在具有外源投入的高斯工艺非线性自回归模型的物理系统建模中的影响。高斯流程建模限制了培训数据点的数量,我们使用大非线性基准数据集。组合调用培训数据采样选择。我们比较基于训练数据点与抽取之间的欧几里德距离的“智能”方法。我们使用两种方法获得的培训数据样本培训模型,测试数据集上的测试模型预测,并计算两个优点,ERMST和平均标准化日志损耗(MSLL)的两个图。在“智能”选定的培训数据点上训练的模型在ERMST中更好,而带有抽取数据的MSLL中的培训更好。直接结论是模型的目的决定了哪种训练数据样本选择方法更好,因为相关的优点图取决于模型目的。我们注意到预测方差对训练数据样本更敏感,而不是预测的平均值。我们警告说,培训数据样本选择可能具有意想不到的后果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号