首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes >Development and content validation of the Satisfaction and Experience Questionnaire for Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (SEQ-G-CSF)
【24h】

Development and content validation of the Satisfaction and Experience Questionnaire for Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (SEQ-G-CSF)

机译:粒细胞菌落刺激因子的满意度和体验调查结果的开发和内容验证(SEQ-G-CSF)

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BackgroundSeveral options for granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia are available to patients worldwide. We have developed a novel patient-reported outcome measure, the Satisfaction and Experience Questionnaire for G-CSF (SEQ-G-CSF), to help understand patients’ perspectives of and satisfaction with different G-CSF options.ResultsThree oncology nurses and 40 adult oncology patients in the United States were enrolled and participated in focus group discussions to develop and refine the SEQ-G-CSF. Nurses had ≥ 5?years of experience treating oncology patients and were currently involved in the management of oncology patients receiving G-CSF prophylaxis. The patients had breast cancer, lung cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, or prostate cancer (10 patients in each group) and were receiving G-CSF prophylaxis via injection or the on-body injector (OBI) device. The preliminary SEQ-G-CSF contained an item relevance questionnaire and three SEQ modules (sociodemographic, medical history, and G-CSF–related healthcare characteristics questionnaires). Twenty-one patients (53% of total sample size) discussed their experience and satisfaction with G-CSF. Their most common experiences were G-CSF effectiveness, convenience and benefits of the OBI, and relationships with healthcare providers. Side effects and having to undergo additional treatment were also reported. Satisfaction with aspects of G-CSF included the OBI and effectiveness of G-CSF treatment; dissatisfaction included inconvenience (having to return to the clinic the next day and administration of the injection) and the insurance approval process. The SEQ-G-CSF was finalized after three rounds of cognitive interviews and includes five domains related to general satisfaction (one item), treatment burden (four items), travel burden (two items), time burden (four items), and treatment compliance (two items).ConclusionsThe SEQ-G-CSF is a novel instrument that quantifies a patient’s experience and satisfaction with different G-CSF options using 13 easy-to-understand items. This study provides evidence for the content validity of SEQ-G-CSF. Although further psychometric testing is required, the SEQ-G-CSF may be a useful addition to clinical trials, observational studies, and clinical practice.
机译:背景技术在全世界患者中可获得粒细胞菌落刺激因子(G-CSF)预防化学疗法诱导的FEREMOPIA的预防选择。我们开发了一种新的患者报告的结果措施,为G-CSF(SEQ-G-CSF)的满意和经验调查问卷,以帮助了解患者对不同G-CSF选项的观点和满意度。肿瘤肿瘤学护士和40名成人美国肿瘤学患者参加并参与了焦点小组讨论,以发展和细化SEQ-G-CSF。护士有≥5?多年的经验治疗肿瘤患者,目前参与了接受G-CSF预防的肿瘤学患者的管理。患者患有乳腺癌,肺癌,非霍奇金淋巴瘤或前列腺癌(每组10名患者),通过注射或体内注射器(OBI)装置接受G-CSF预防。初步的SEQ-G-CSF包含了物品相关问卷和三个SEQ模块(社会阶乘,病史和G-CSF相关的医疗特征问卷)。二十一名患者(总样本大小的53%)讨论了与G-CSF的经验和满意度。他们最常见的经验是对象的G-CSF效力,便利性和益处,以及与医疗保健提供者的关系。还报道了副作用并不得不接受额外的治疗方法。对G-CSF方面的满意度包括G-CSF治疗的OBI和有效性;不满意包括不便(不得不在第二天返回诊所并管理注射)和保险审批程序。在三轮认知访谈后,SEQ-G-CSF最终确定,包括与一般满意度(一件物品),治疗负担(四项),旅行负担(两个项目),时间负担(四项)以及治疗合规性(两个项目).Conclusionsthe SEQ-G-CSF是一种新颖的仪器,可以使用13个易于理解的物品来定量患者的经验和满意度与不同的G-CSF选项。本研究提供了SEQ-G-CSF内容有效性的证据。虽然需要进一步的心理测量测试,但SEQ-G-CSF可能是临床试验,观察研究和临床实践的有用补充。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号