首页> 外文期刊>JGH OPEN >Safety, feasibility, and comfort of hepatic angiography and transarterial intervention with radial access for hepatocellular carcinoma
【24h】

Safety, feasibility, and comfort of hepatic angiography and transarterial intervention with radial access for hepatocellular carcinoma

机译:肝脏血管造影的安全性,可行性和舒适性,急性介入肝细胞癌

获取原文
           

摘要

Background and Aim Hepatic angiography procedures such as transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) are essential procedures for managing patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and are usually performed with femoral access. However, femoral access causes patient discomfort and may be associated with the risk of hematoma or pseudoaneurysm at puncture site. We evaluated the safety, feasibility, and patient comfort of hepatic angiography procedures performed with radial access. Methods In this single-institution, retrospective, time-frame study, a total of 206 patients who underwent hepatic angiography procedures with radial access, which were first used on October 2017 at our institution, were compared with 240 patients who underwent the same procedures with femoral access before this period. Several measures were assessed, including procedure time and safety. In addition, a questionnaire was used to compare the access types regarding procedure-associated discomfort. Results Hepatic angiography procedures performed with radial access, including TACE, were completed in all patients without complications. The procedure time was comparable between radial access and femoral access. Most patients preferred radial to femoral access. Patients taking anticoagulants were able to complete the procedures without discontinuing these drugs. Conclusions Hepatic angiography procedures with radial access resulted in less discomfort than those with femoral access, and the two approaches showed similar feasibility and safety. Radial access can be introduced as a routine technique for hepatic angiography procedures.
机译:背景和AIM肝脏血管造影程序如relarterial Chemoembolization(TACE)是用于管理肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的基本程序,通常用股骨进入进行。然而,股骨进入导致患者的不适,并且可能与穿刺部位的血肿或假肿瘤的风险相关。我们评估了径向进入进行的肝脏血管造影手术的安全性,可行性和患者舒适性。方法在本机制,回顾性,时帧研究中,共有206名患者接受肝脏血管造影手术的径向进入,其在2017年10月在我们的机构中​​首次使用,与240名患者进行了比较了相同的程序在此期间之前的股权访问。评估了几项措施,包括程序时间和安全。此外,使用问卷来比较关于程序相关的不适的访问类型。结果肝脏血管造影手术,包括径向进入,包括TACE,在所有没有并发症的患者中完成。径向访问和股骨访问之间的程序时间相当。大多数患者倾向于升高到股骨进入。服用抗凝血剂的患者能够在不终止这些药物的情况下完成该程序。结论肝脏血管造影程序具有径向通道的程序导致比具有股骨进入的不适,两种方法表现出类似的可行性和安全性。可以作为肝脏血管造影手术的常规技术引入径向访问。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号