首页> 外文期刊>Translational Research in Anatomy >Can the morphological attributes of greater palatine foramen have implications in maxillary nerve block? An analytical study using anatomical planes
【24h】

Can the morphological attributes of greater palatine foramen have implications in maxillary nerve block? An analytical study using anatomical planes

机译:可以在上颌神经块中产生更高腭孔的形态属性吗? 利用解剖学飞机的分析研究

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Introduction Most popular approach for maxillary nerve block is via greater palatine canal (GPC) which is often difficult to access due to anatomical variations of its entry point the greater palatine foramen (GPF) thus resulting in failure of nerve block. It was hypothesized that exploring morphology of GPF with a modified approach may be useful towards its localization in an accurate manner. Materials & methods The study was conducted on 35 dry adult human skulls with help of anatomical planes and quadrants on surface of hard palate on both sides of mid-sagittal plane (MSP). Results It was observed that GPF was located predominantly in Md 2 and M 2 quadrants with an incidence of 88.83% and 88.84% on the left and right side of MSP respectively (when third maxillary molar is present) and in 100% cases on both sides of MSP (when third molar is absent). MSP was identified as preferred plane for GPC approach because of its proximity to upper incisors. Two rectangular areas were identified around point of intersection (Px) between P2 and P3 anatomical planes (5?mm anterior to Px, 2?mm posterior to Px and 2?mm on either side of Px) and posterior to point of intersection (Py) between P2 and P4 anatomical planes (5?mm posterior to Py and 2?mm on either side of Py) with high incidence of GPF when third molar is present or absent respectively. Conclusion The observations from this study may reduce risk of error in localizing GPF during maxillary nerve block.
机译:引言上颌神经块的最流行方法是通过更大的腭管(GPC)(GPC),由于其进入点的解剖变化,通常难以进入更大的普拉汀·孔(GPF),因此导致神经块的失效。假设具有修改方法的GPF的形态,可以以准确的方式对其本地化有用。材料和方法在中间矢状平面(MSP)两侧有35个干燥的成人人体颅骨上进行35个干燥成人人类头骨和硬腭表面的象限。结果观察到GPF主要位于MD 2和M 2象限中,分别在MD 2和MS的左侧和右侧发病率为88.83%和88.84%(当存在第三上颌摩尔时)和两侧100% MSP(不存在第三摩尔时)。由于其接近上部门牙,MSP被识别为GPC方法的优选平面。在P2和P3解剖面(5?mm前面至px,2Ωmm后部的Px,2Ωmm后部的Px)之间的交叉点(Px)之间识别了两个矩形区域,并且在PX的任一侧上的PX和2?mm)和交叉点后部(PY )在存在或不存在时,P2和P4释放平面(PY在Py的两侧的5毫秒和2·mm)中,并且当存在第三摩尔时,GPF的发病率高。结论本研究的观察可能会降低上颌神经块期间定位GPF误差风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号