首页> 外文期刊>Open Journal of Modern Neurosurgery >Comparison of Physical Therapy Follow-Up of Patients with Operated and Non-Operated Lumbar Spinal Stenosis According to the Nottingham Health Profile-Pain Scale
【24h】

Comparison of Physical Therapy Follow-Up of Patients with Operated and Non-Operated Lumbar Spinal Stenosis According to the Nottingham Health Profile-Pain Scale

机译:根据诺丁汉卫生型疼痛量表的操作和非操作腰椎狭窄患者物理治疗随访的比较

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) continues to be a major problem in societies, causing job loss and lowering quality of life. There are two types of treatment methods, physical therapy and surgery. If patients with LSS avoid treatment, they are likely to experience neurological deterioration in later years. Objective: The study aimed to evaluate the effect of physical therapy applied after decompression surgery or the effect of only applied physical therapy in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Materials and Methods: The results of the physical therapy follow-up of patients who had surgery and did not have surgery due to lumbar spinal stenosis between July 2014 and December 2019 were compared with each other. All patients received physical therapy for 6 months. Included were 42 patients who underwent decompression surgery due to LSS ; 56 patients were not operated. Clinical outcomes were measured using the Nottingham Health Profile-Pain (NHP-Pain) scale at the initial, first, third and sixth months. The results were compared statistically. Results: The age of the operated patients was 54.69 ± 8.42 (39 - 71), while the non-operated patients were 59.16 ± 14.04 (34 - 83). There was no significant difference in the statistical comparison (p = 0.053). While the body mass index (BMI) of the operated patients was 29.43 ± 4.99 (21 - 40), the BMI of the non-operated patients was 28.84 ± 4.62 (22 - 42). There was no significant difference in the statistical comparison (p = 0.552). The scores of a 6-month physical therapy follow-up of patients were evaluated according to the NHP-pain scale. The values of patients who underwent surgery, initial - 1st month (p < 0.001), 1st month - 3rd month (p = 0.028), 3rd month - 6th month (p = 0.389) follow-up of the intervals were compared statistically. The values of non-operated patients, initial - 1st month (p = 0.008), 1st month -3rd month (p = 0.013), 3rd month - 6th month (p = 0.025) were compared statistically. Patients with and without surgery had significantly different initial pain scores (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The NHP-Pain scores of the patients undergoing physical therapy with the operation were shown to provide more significant improvement than the group receiving only the physical therapy. Patients with LSS should be treated with an operation to obtain the maximum benefit of physical therapy.
机译:背景:腰椎狭窄(LSS)继续成为社会的主要问题,造成工作损失和降低生活质量。有两种类型的治疗方法,物理治疗和手术。如果患有LSS的患者避免治疗,他们可能会在后期经历神经系统恶化。 目的:研究旨在评估减压手术后施用的物理治疗的影响或仅应用腰椎狭窄患者的应用物理治疗的效果。 材料和方法:彼此相比,患有手术的患者的患者的物理治疗随访和没有手术的结果。所有患者均接受了6个月的物理治疗。包括42名患者因LSS而受到减压手术的患者; 56名患者没有运营。使用诺丁汉健康型疼痛(NHP疼痛)在初始,第三和第六个月来测量临床结果。结果在统计上进行比较。 结果:操作患者的年龄是54.69±8.42(39-71),而非操作患者为59.16±14.04(34 - 83)。统计比较没有显着差异(P = 0.053)。虽然操作患者的体重指数(BMI)为29.43±4.99(21-40),但非操作患者的BMI为28.84±4.62(22-42)。统计比较没有显着差异(P = 0.552)。根据NHP疼痛量表评估患者的6个月物理治疗后续的分数。经过手术,初始 - 第1个月(P <0.001),第1个月 - 第3个月(P = 0.028),第3个月 - 第6个月(P = 0.389)的患者的价值在统计上比较了间隔的后续行动。非操作患者的价值,初始 - 第1个月(P = 0.008),第一个月-3RD月(P = 0.013),第3个月 - 第6个月(P = 0.025)进行统计学。患有患者和没有手术的患者具有显着不同的初始疼痛评分(P <0.001)。 结论:接受该手术的患者的NHP疼痛评分显示出比仅接受物理治疗的基团提供更大的改善。应用手术治疗LSS患者以获得物理治疗的最大效益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号