首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Clinical Medicine >A Comparison of Five Adhesive Tapes for Securing Endotracheal Tube in a Manikin
【24h】

A Comparison of Five Adhesive Tapes for Securing Endotracheal Tube in a Manikin

机译:五种粘贴带固定人体模拟插管的胶带的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Adhesive tape is the common method for endotracheal tube (ETT) secured to prevent tube displacement and unplanned extubation in an anesthesia setting. However, it is unclear which tape is superior for ETT fixation among the various tapes used in clinical practice. This study examines the force required to move 2 cm ETT and extubate ETT from an intubation manikin with five different adhesive tapes. Methods: We orally intubated an adult intubation manikin with an inner-diameter 7.5 mm ETT, inflated the cuff to 20 cm H_(2)O. Then we secured ETT with five different adhesive tapes (Transpore tape~(TM), Urgosyval tape ~(&reg;) , Transpore~(TM )White tape, Multipore tape, Durapore~(TM) tape) in a conventional fixation method. A digital force gauge was connected to the ETT and pulled in a direction erected to the oral cavity. We measured the force required to move 2 cm ETT and extubate ETT (defined as 5 cm ETT displacement) from the manikin. Data were analyzed with one-way analysis of variance, with P < 0.05. Results: Durapore~(TM) tape had the largest average force of 2 cm displacement (58.9 ± 5.7N) ( P < 0.05). The extubation force of Durapore~(TM) tape (59.7 ± 4.9N) was larger than Urgosyval ~(&reg;) tape (40.4 ± 2.9N) ( P < 0.05), Transpore~(TM) tape (48.7 ± 5.1N) ( P < 0.05), Transpore White~(TM) tape (48.7 ± 5.1N) ( P < 0.05). Conclusion: Durapore~(TM) tape was superior to the other four tapes (Transpore~(TM) tape, Urgosyval ~(&reg;) tape, Transpore~(TM) white tape, Multipore tape) in holding the ETT in place in the manikin.
机译:背景:胶带是固定的气管内管(ETT)的常用方法,以防止管位移和在麻醉设定中拔管。然而,临床实践中使用的各种胶带中,尚不清楚哪种胶带优于ETT固定。本研究审查了移动2厘米ETT的力量,并用五种不同的胶带从插管人体模型中拔管欧特。方法:我们口服插管,内径7.5 mm eTT的成人插管人体模型,将袖带膨胀至20厘米H_(2)o。然后,我们用五种不同的胶带(Tmantpore Tabe〜(TM),骨科胶带〜(&amp; reg;),传统固定方法中的传统〜 。数字力量表连接到ETT并沿着竖立于口腔的方向上拉动。我们测量了移动2cm eTT的力所需的力,并从Manikin拔管ETT(定义为5cm eTT位移)。通过单向分析进行分析数据,P <0.05。结果:Duropore〜(TM)胶带的平均力为2厘米(58.9±5.7N)(P <0.05)。 Duropore〜(TM)胶带(59.7±4.9N)的拔管力大于尿素〜(&amp; reg;)胶带(40.4±2.9N)(P <0.05),转孔〜(TM)胶带(48.7±5.1 n)(p <0.05),转孔白〜(Tm)胶带(48.7±5.1N)(P <0.05)。结论:DuRapore〜(TM)胶带优于其他四个磁带(TMANTPORE〜(TM)胶带,骨科VAL〜(&amp; reg;)胶带,TRANSEPORE〜(TM)白色胶带,多孔胶带)在保持ETT到位在manikin。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号