首页> 外文期刊>Asian journal of surgery >Surgical options for perianal fistula in patients with Crohn's disease: A comparison of seton placement, fistulotomy, and stem cell therapy
【24h】

Surgical options for perianal fistula in patients with Crohn's disease: A comparison of seton placement, fistulotomy, and stem cell therapy

机译:克罗恩病患者的肛周瘘管外科选择:塞塞放置,瘘管和干细胞疗法的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

ObjectiveThis study was designed to assess the demographic characteristics of patients with Crohn's perianal fistula (CPF) who were treated at a tertiary referral institution. Surgical outcomes were compared in groups of patients who underwent seton placement, fistulotomy, and stem cell therapy.MethodsPatients who underwent surgery for CPF between 2015 and 2017?at Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were divided into groups who underwent seton placement, fistulotomy, and stem cell therapy. Their clinical variables and closure rates were compared.ResultsThis study included 156 patients who underwent a total of 209 operations. More than half of the operations consisted of seton placement (67%), followed by stem cell therapy (18%) and fistulotomy (15%) patients. Of the 209 fistulas, 153 (73%) were complex, with an overall closure rate of 38% during a median follow-up of 29 months. Closure rates following fistulotomy, stem cell therapy, and seton placement were 90%, 70%, and 18%. Seton placement was more significantly frequently used than the other procedures in patients with complex fistula and those with abscesses. Of the 79 fistulas that achieved complete closure, 11 (14%) recurred. The recurrence rates did not differ among the various techniques.ConclusionSurgical treatment of CPF is dependent on lesion type. Seton placement was the primary draining procedure for complex fistulas and abscesses, resulting in low closure rates. Fistulotomy was the definite procedure for low type and simple fistula. Stem cell therapy showed high closure rates as definitive treatment, even for complex fistulas.
机译:客观的研究旨在评估在高等教育机构治疗的克罗恩泛瘘(CPF)患者的人口特征。将手术结果进行比较,以塞塞放置,瘘管和干细胞治疗的患者组..在2015年和2017年之间接受了CPF的手术的方法?在Asan Medical Center,韩国首尔,回顾性评估。患者分为何种塞塞放置,瘘管和干细胞疗法的群体。比较了他们的临床变量和闭包。培养学习包括156名患者,共有209次操作。超过一半的操作由塞子置入(67%)组成,其次是干细胞疗法(18%)和瘘管术(15%)患者。在209个瘘管中,153(73%)复杂,总闭合率为38%,在29个月的中间后续延续期间。瘘管切开术后,干细胞疗法和塞塞置的闭合率为90%,70%和18%。更频繁地常用于复杂瘘管的其他程序和具有脓肿的患者。在实现完全闭合的79个瘘管中,再次发生11(14%)。复发率在各种技术中没有差异。CPF的链接治疗依赖于病变类型。 Seton Placement是复杂瘘管和脓肿的主要排水程序,导致封闭率低。瘘管切开术是低类型和简单瘘的明确程序。干细胞疗法显示出高闭合率作为最终的治疗,即使是复杂的瘘管。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号