首页> 外文期刊>Burns Open >Single stage first layer biosynthetic cellulose dressing versus non-adherent gauze management in paediatric burns
【24h】

Single stage first layer biosynthetic cellulose dressing versus non-adherent gauze management in paediatric burns

机译:单级第一层生物合成纤维素敷料与小儿烧伤的非粘附纱布管理

获取原文
       

摘要

Introduction Paediatric burn is a common emergency presentation with a variety of treatment options available. Major parental concerns include pain, healing and scarring, in addition to high parental anxiety. Epiprotect? is a biosynthetic cellulose-based sheet, applied as a single stage first layer contact dressing following initial debridement. Materials and Methods A retrospective case control comparison study was carried out in our hospital on 28 patients, 14 with biosynthetic cellulose, and 14 with non-adherent gauze. Pain and parental anxiety were measured by the parental perception of child’s pain on Wong-Baker faces pain rating scale and STAI-6 questionnaire (compatible with the STAI-S scoring system) respectively in first clinic visit during outer dressing change. Scar score was calculated using the Vancouver scar scale (VSS). Results Patients in both groups had a similar demographic and clinical distribution of location, mechanism of burn, first aid, surface area and depth of burn. Pain and parental anxiety were significantly reduced in the cellulose dressing group (p?=?0.0001). Time to complete healing were similar in both groups. Mean VSS scar score was 4 (1–5) in cellulose dressing group compared to 6 (4–11) in non-adherent gauze group (p?=?0.0463). Two patients developed hypertrophied scar in non-adherent gauze group. The mean number of outpatient clinic visits in cellulose dressing group were 2.5 (1–5) as compared to 3 (2–6) in the non-adherent gauze group (p?=?0.0607). Conclusion Single stage first layer application of biosynthetic cellulose dressing is associated with reduced pain, parental anxiety, and improved scarring. The dressing is safe and can be applied to patients with superficial and mixed depth burns.
机译:引言儿科烧伤是一种常见的应急演示,可提供各种治疗选择。除了高父母的焦虑之外,主要父母的担忧包括疼痛,治愈和疤痕。 epiprotect?是一种基于生物合成纤维素的薄片,其作为初始清代之后的单级第一层接触敷料。材料和方法通过28名患者,14名患者进行了回顾性案例控制比较研究,其中14名患者,14例,具有非粘附纱布。痛苦和父母焦虑是通过对黄贝克对黄贝克的痛苦痛苦的父母的看法来衡量疼痛评定规模和斯泰-6问卷(与STAI-S评分系统兼容)在外部敷料发生变化期间的第一次诊所访问。使用温哥华疤痕量表(VSS)计算疤痕分数。结果两组患者具有相似的人口统计和临床分布,烧伤,急救,表面积和烧伤深度的机制。纤维素敷料组中的疼痛和父母焦虑显着降低(P?= 0.0001)。两组完全愈合的时间相似。纤维素敷料组的平均VSS疤痕评分为4(1-5),而非粘附纱布组中的6(4-11)(p?= 0.0463)。两名患者在非粘附纱布组中发育肥大瘢痕。与非粘附纱布组中的3(2-6)相比,纤维素敷料组的平均门诊临床诊所访问的平均诊所诊所(1-5)(p?= 0.0607)。结论单级第一层生物合成纤维素敷料的应用与减少的疼痛,父母焦虑和改进的瘢痕形成有关。敷料是安全的,可应用于浅表和混合深度燃烧的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号