...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth >Frequency and severity of prehospital obstetric events encountered by emergency medical services in the United States
【24h】

Frequency and severity of prehospital obstetric events encountered by emergency medical services in the United States

机译:紧急医疗服务在美国遇到的前产科活动的频率和严重程度

获取原文

摘要

Prehospital obstetric events encountered by emergency medical services (EMS) can be high-risk patient presentations for which suboptimal care can cause substantial morbidity and mortality. The frequency of prehospital obstetric events is unclear because existing descriptions have reported obstetric and gynecological conditions together, without delineating specific patient presentations. Our objective was to identify the types, frequency, and acuity of prehospital obstetric events treated by EMS personnel in the US. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of EMS patient care records in the 2018 National EMS Information System dataset (n=22,532,890). We focused on EMS activations (i.e., calls for service) for an emergency scene response for patients aged 12-50 years with evidence of an obstetric event. Type of obstetric event was determined by examining patient symptoms, the treating EMS provider’s impression (i.e., field diagnosis), and procedures performed. High patient acuity was ascertained by EMS documentation of patient status and application of the modified early obstetric warning system (MEOWS) criteria, with concordance assessed using Cohen’s kappa. Descriptive statistics were calculated to describe the primary symptoms, impressions, and frequency of each type of obstetric event among these activations. A total of 107,771 (0.6%) of EMS emergency activations were identified as involving an obstetric event. The most common presentation was early or threatened labor (15%). Abdominal complaints, including pain and other digestive/abdomen signs and symptoms, was the most common primary symptom (29%) and primary impression (18%). We identified 3,489 (3%) out-of-hospital deliveries, of which 1,504 were preterm. Overall, EMS providers documented 34% of patients as being high acuity, similar to the MEOWS criteria (35%); however, there were high rates of missing data for EMS documented acuity (19%), poor concordance between the two measures (Cohen’s kappa=0.12), and acuity differences for specific conditions (e.g., high acuity of non-cephalic presentations, 77% in EMS documentation versus 53% identified by MEOWS). Prehospital obstetric events were infrequently encountered by EMS personnel, and about one-third were high acuity. Additional work to understand the epidemiology and clinical care of these patients by EMS would help to optimize prehospital care and outcomes.
机译:紧急医疗服务(EMS)遇到的前产科活动可以是高风险的患者介绍,次优护理可能导致大量发病率和死亡率。前产科事件的频率尚不清楚,因为现有的描述已经报告了产科和妇科条件,而不会划定特定的患者演示。我们的目标是确定美国EMS人员治疗的前产科活动的类型,频率和敏锐度。我们对2018年国家EMS信息系统数据集进行了EMS患者护理记录的横截面分析(n = 22,532,890)。我们专注于EMS激活(即,服务呼叫),以便在12-50岁的患者中响应有产科活动的患者的紧急情况响应。通过检查患者症状,治疗EMS提供者的印象(即现场诊断)和程序进行的产科事件类型。 EMS对患者现状和修改后产科警告系统(Meows)标准的患者现状和应用的高患者进行了认证,并使用Cohen的Kappa进行了一致性评估。计算描述性统计数据以描述这些激活中每种产科事务事件的主要症状,印象和频率。共有107,771(0.6%)EMS应急激活,涉及产科活动。最常见的演示是早期或威胁的劳动力(15%)。腹部投诉,包括疼痛和其他消化/腹部症状和症状,是最常见的主要症状(29%)和主要印象(18%)。我们确定了3,489(3%)的医院外交付,其中1,504次是早产。总体而言,EMS提供商将34%的患者记录为高敏锐度,类似于培养兆标准(35%);但是,对EMS记录的敏捷数据缺失有高率(19%),两项措施之间的一致性差(Cohen的Kappa = 0.12),以及特定条件的敏锐差异(例如,非头骨介绍的高敏锐度,77%在EMS文件中,由MEOWS确定的53%)。 EMS人员常常遇到的前产科事件,大约三分之一是高敏锐度。通过EMS了解这些患者的流行病学和临床护理的额外工作将有助于优化预孢子护理和结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号