首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pulmonary Medicine >Should the physiotherapy outcomes airway clearance, physical activity and fitness be recorded on the Australian Cystic Fibrosis Data Registry? A consensus approach
【24h】

Should the physiotherapy outcomes airway clearance, physical activity and fitness be recorded on the Australian Cystic Fibrosis Data Registry? A consensus approach

机译:是否应在澳大利亚囊性纤维化数据登记处记录气道清关,身体活动和健身吗? 共识方法

获取原文
           

摘要

Physiotherapy is a cornerstone of cystic fibrosis (CF) management, yet the Australian CF Data Registry (ACFDR) currently does not record physiotherapy-related data. This study aimed to gather opinions from lead Australian CF physiotherapists regarding the importance and feasibility of collecting physiotherapy-related data on the ACFDR. A three-round online Delphi survey was conducted to gather expert stakeholder opinion and consensus agreement. Lead physiotherapists from all 23 Australian CF centres were invited to participate. Round one explored the potential benefits, barriers and importance of recording three physiotherapy-related domains on the ACFDR: airway clearance, physical activity and fitness. Subsequent rounds were developed based on the findings from the previous round and sought consensus (80% agreement) for the inclusion of physiotherapy-related data on the ACFDR and for the most appropriate methods of collecting such data. The response rate was??80% for all rounds. Participants agreed that collection of airway clearance, physical activity and fitness data on the ACFDR was important and feasible. Findings suggested that airway clearance and physical activity should be collected using self-reported questionnaires, while fitness should be measured using a field-based test. Australian lead CF physiotherapists believe that collection of airway clearance, physical activity and fitness on the ACFDR is important and feasible. Future work is needed to pilot the data collection procedure to examine its feasibility in real-world clinical settings. This study demonstrates how Delphi methodology can provide a contemporary summary of expert clinicians’ opinion that may underpin nation-wide health service improvement.
机译:物理疗法是囊性纤维化(CF)管理的基石,但澳大利亚CF数据登记处(ACFDR)目前没有记录与物理疗法相关的数据。本研究旨在收集来自欧洲委员会CF物理治疗师的意见,了解收集在ACFDR上的物理疗法相关数据的重要性和可行性。进行了三轮在线德尔福调查,以收集专家利益相关者的意见和协商一致意见。来自所有23个澳大利亚CF中心的铅物理治疗师被邀请参加。第一个探讨了在ACFDR上录制三个物理疗法相关领域的潜在福利,障碍和重要性:气道清关,身体活动和健身。随后的一轮是根据前一轮的调查结果开发的,并寻求共识(80%协议),以包含对ACFDR上的物理疗法相关数据,并获得最适合收集此类数据的方法。响应率是?&?80%的所有轮次。参与者同意,ACFDR上的气道清仓,身体活动和健身数据集是重要的,可行的。调查结果表明,应使用自我报告的问卷收集气道清除和身体活动,而应使用基于现场的测试来测量健身。澳大利亚铅CF物理治疗师认为,ACFDR上的气道清仓,身体活动和健身是重要的,可行的。需要未来的工作来试点数据收集程序,以检查其在现实世界临床环境中的可行性。该研究表明了Delphi方法如何提供当代临床医生认为可能支持全国的健康服务改进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号